Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Jul 2012 22:27 UTC, submitted by Piet Simons
Thread beginning with comment 525574
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: You can't have your cake and eat it too
by shmerl on Fri 6th Jul 2012 06:59
in reply to "RE[4]: You can't have your cake and eat it too"
I can imagine how someone will try using a complex IDE, graphical or publishing / video / audio editors, or some 3D modeling software on a tablet. It's simply doesn't let such kind of usage productively. So desktops aren't going anywhere. Tablets might become more widespread, but desktops are here to stay. And it's good to remember, that making and debugging programs for those very tablets developers will prefer using comfortable widescreen monitors and ergonomic keyboards. Therefore any universal OS needs to address regular desktop use case.
Edited 2012-07-06 07:02 UTC
RE[6]: You can't have your cake and eat it too
by Nelson on Fri 6th Jul 2012 07:12
in reply to "RE[5]: You can't have your cake and eat it too"
RE[6]: You can't have your cake and eat it too
by zima on Thu 12th Jul 2012 21:01
in reply to "RE[5]: You can't have your cake and eat it too"
I can imagine how someone will try using a complex IDE, graphical or publishing / video / audio editors, or some 3D modeling software on a tablet. It's simply doesn't let such kind of usage productively. So desktops aren't going anywhere. Tablets might become more widespread, but desktops are here to stay.
I refuse to believe you have such weak imagination... it looks more as if you're purposefully trying to not see how absolutely awesome "a complex [...] graphical or publishing / video / audio editors, or some 3D modeling software" can be on a touchscreen.
Preferably a largish touchscreen, for most of them, sure - but that's still closer to a tablet than to a traditional desktop.
And/or, possibly similarly great, synthesis of the two - where ~tablet acts as the primary input device, most of the interactive elements on it (while large monitor - all wirelessly connected perhaps - offers mostly a full-screen preview of edited video or newspaper layout, for example; still very different from present desktops, with very different UI model)
That leaves IDE...
And it's good to remember, that making and debugging programs for those very tablets developers will prefer using comfortable widescreen monitors and ergonomic keyboards. Therefore any universal OS needs to address regular desktop use case.
...which is done by minuscule number of people. So don't be surprised if "any universal OS" won't be pandering to them too much. Maybe that means a sort of return of one category of old-style workstations / terminals. Maybe they'll be happy with hooking up a keyboard to the "more touch" OS. Maybe touchscreen for ~input + large display for ~output will often suffice (with keyboard displayed on the touchscreen - you might shrug it off, but good development is not about typing a lot quickly). We'll see, the sky won't fall either way (or, possibly, if we'll do all of those three, and maybe some other variants)





Member since:
2005-11-29
I just really don't think so. As Desktops become more and more niche devices, they command less and less attention. I think many people have a desktop to have one, not because they actually get tons of work done on it. Switching to other form factors I think will be natural and an eventuality for a lot of consumers.