Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Jul 2012 00:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 526776
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: A question of price.
by Beta on Sat 14th Jul 2012 18:33
in reply to "RE[4]: A question of price."
RE[6]: A question of price.
by MOS6510 on Sat 14th Jul 2012 19:46
in reply to "RE[5]: A question of price."
RE[5]: A question of price.
by moondevil on Sat 14th Jul 2012 19:27
in reply to "RE[4]: A question of price."
RE[6]: A question of price.
by MOS6510 on Sat 14th Jul 2012 19:48
in reply to "RE[5]: A question of price."




Member since:
2011-05-12
It's more fun to be a minority.
But I'll make these two quick remarks:
Samsung and ... HTC??? HTC is not doing well at all. It can't take on Samsung, let alone Apple, and it will probably probably drown in the small sea of small up-and-coming Android manufactures. It's not a good day to be HTC, RIM or Nokia.
Apple makes by far most the money. They could easily slash prizes if they should choose to, even sell at a loss (and make profit with iTunes sales). They don't, which means they probably like the situation as it is now.
They may say they create the devices they themselves want to use, but it's obviously about the Benjamins and they chose, what they think, the best way to get the most money. Cheaper phones will get them more marketshare, but the margins will be much lower and the buyers probably won't spend much in the iTunes store.
Don't forget Steve, when the iPhone was introduced, said he was aiming for 1% marketshare, which leads to believe that with 1% they'd make money.