Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Dec 2012 23:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 545062
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
IMO. What Microsoft never got right, until recently, is that usage patterns for mobile devices are different than desktops'. I.e. almost nobody gives a shit about running Office on a phone.
Funny thing is, they've tried to go in the exact opposite direction, e.g. Metro. Yet, Office on Windows RT has no touch optimizations, and is virtually the same as Office on your PC. It's as if Microsoft don't really have a coherent idea where they'd like to go, and are trying to do everything at once and failing more than succeeding. While it's cliche, the phrase "jack of all trades, master of none" comes to mind when thinking about Microsoft recently. Add to that, I'm not sure how much adoption they'll get on a subscription basis. Most people are already paying enough for various services as is and, especially if they've already bought Office for whichever computer they have, I don't think repeated payments to Microsoft will sit well on top of what Office already cost them.




Member since:
2009-03-17
Ability to run (or interact with) Office has been one of Microsoft's main value propositions for their phone OSes. And yet their market share there has dropped like a lead balloon: from almost 40% down to 3% in 5 years (it has regained some ground in the past few months though).
IMO. What Microsoft never got right, until recently, is that usage patterns for mobile devices are different than desktops'. I.e. almost nobody gives a shit about running Office on a phone.