Linked by the_randymon on Mon 7th Jan 2013 18:56 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes The mostly-morubund Hurd project is well known for what it's not: the kernel at the heart of the GNU/Linux system. But there's a long and interesting story about what it could have been, too. From Linux User magazine: "The design of the Hurd was an attempt to embody the spirit and promise of the free software movement in code." Those are mighty ambitions, and this story is as much about competing visions as competing kernels. Says Thomas Bushnell: "My first choice was to take the BSD 4.4-Lite release and make a kernel. I knew the code, I knew how to do it. It is now perfectly obvious to me that this would have succeeded splendidly and the world would be a very different place today." This is a well-written and fascinating read.
Thread beginning with comment 547788
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Tue 8th Jan 2013 14:53 UTC in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by MOS6510"
Member since:

Oh, I don't mind them doing it. If I google I'm sure I can find countless hobbies that are really much worse.

I just think their goals aren't realistic, but I probably would have thought the same thing had I read Linus' historic post.

The thing about IT and probably a lot of things in live in general is that great ideas don't often work out, but strange enough bad ones more often become hits.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[9]: Comment by MOS6510
by lucas_maximus on Tue 8th Jan 2013 22:21 in reply to "RE[8]: Comment by MOS6510"
lucas_maximus Member since:

It was in the unix haters handbook "worse is better principle".

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[10]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Wed 9th Jan 2013 01:41 in reply to "RE[9]: Comment by MOS6510"
MOS6510 Member since:

You hate UNIX so much you bought that book? :-p

Reply Parent Score: 2