Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Dec 2013 07:53 UTC, submitted by Hiev
General Development

Google believes Dart speeds up both developers and the programs they write, but skeptics worry that it fragments Web programming and undermines the industry's focus on better JavaScript. So far, it's been a largely academic debate, but that will change in coming months.

That's because Google right now is building Dart technology directly into Chrome.

Does anyone here use Dart?

Thread beginning with comment 579205
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Dart
by moltonel on Fri 20th Dec 2013 14:37 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Dart"
Member since:

I'd rather see a JS-with-perf-extensions in the VM (e.g. structs and type annotations, integers, ...), that TypeScript, CoffeeScript & friends would compile to.

That's pretty much what asm.js is. It's hard to call it an "extension" because it removes stuff from the language instead of adding to it, but it has the distinct advantage of being proper javascript that can run unmodified even on a browser that only knows about plain javascript (not sure what the performance profile is in this case).

As for type annotations and similar, since you can generate asm.js code from llvm bytecode, you have a large choice of languages to write your code in.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Dart
by vivainio on Fri 20th Dec 2013 17:03 in reply to "RE[4]: Dart"
vivainio Member since:

I'm thinking something sane and debuggable (asm.js doean't even have a string type).

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Dart
by lvl21ogre on Fri 20th Dec 2013 18:33 in reply to "RE[5]: Dart"
lvl21ogre Member since:

asm.js is also very new technology. They're considering a string type, among other things.

Reply Parent Score: 2