By itself, the release of OpenOffice.org for Scots Gaelic is a small event within the communities of FOSS. However, the release shows a potential for FOSS that is often overlooked, particularly by those for whom English is their native language. Specifically, FOSS has the potential to help resuscitate a declining language and thereby aid in revitalizing a disintegrating culture.
FOSS: A Role In Preserving Language And Culture?
31 Comments
tim h: why do people want to keep alive languages that will be dead soon?? It would be easier for everyone just to use english or german or something… mor elanguages complicates everything.
In many ways this is very true. More languages do complicate things. We can see this with computer software (for those who have trouble grasping the concept), let’s say we used (somehow) IPX, AppleTalk, and TCP/IP on the internet. The internet would be a lot more complicated and not everyone would be able to access the same things. It would be a serious pain.
Standards help public communication a lot.
However… Sometimes it’s easier to handle certain concepts in one language than it is to do in another. Sometimes it’s also useful to speak in a different language, for example perhaps you want privacy and none is available. If you and whoever you wish to talk to speak an uncommon language, you can simply switch to that language. And the uses go on and on…
Coming from wales I can’t really see the point of keeping a language alive other than for historical and research purposes. They spend a fortune on keeping welsh alive, money which could be spent on other cultural activities.
Onbviously, coming from Wales, Welsh isn’t your native language. Your great grandfather probably learnt english whle wearing a horsheshoe on his neck so he wouldn’t babble in a future dead language.
I wonder how much money could be saved if people didn’t waste it in english classes. ‘Just follow the mob’ isn’t an attractive philosophy for everyone.
In scotland the language is pretty dead (compared to welsh) and yet scotland has a much more vibrant scottish culture than wales.
In Scotland the dominant language has always been Scots, which is alive and kicking. Scottish Gaelic arrived in Scotland at about the same time as Scots, and both displaced the local brythonic (Welsh’s own ancestor).
A language is part of culture. Witout Welsh, Wales wold have precisely the same amount of culture, but a precious part of it would be shared with England. That’s not wrong, just different from what it is now.
There is no better language we should all speak, all languages are equally respectable, in any case, even if they are spoken by very few people.
Thats not entirely true english is the most flexible language around especially when it comes to making up new words(ever seen the german word for partioning a hard drive) Hence the reason that english is the prefered business language in alot of european companies.
Thats not entirely true english is the most flexible language around
More flexible doesn’t mean better. Someone else hit the nail on the head by saying that not all concepts can be as easily expressed in all languages.
especially when it comes to making up new words(ever seen the german word for partioning a hard drive)
Actually, German is more flexible when it comes to making up new words, since all you need to do is string up words together, i.e. the German word for hard drive partitioning is akin to “harddrivepartitioning”. Note that English, which has some germanic roots, has inherited some of this: some composite words tend to become hyphenated for a while, and eventually merge into one word.
On a side note, it is enlightening to see that those who don’t see the need for “rare” languages are the same who tend to actively defend Microsoft’s monopoly. Should we conclude that cultural imperialism is closesly related to OS imperialism as well? Never has the image of Bill Gates as the Borg been more relevant…
Language serves to tie people together more closely than other things. I know it drives some seperation between peoples, but it makes us interesting. After all, do we really all want to use english uni-windows, eat at uni-mcdonalds, and shop at uni-walmart… Too much sameness is a bad thing… [i’m reminded of the Fairly Oddparents episode where he wished everybody was the same.. so everybody was made into formless, grey blobs!!! You couldn’t recognize anybody.] people tend to get into trouble.. after all, if we’re all exactly the same there’d be nothing out there to see new or explore or meet new people!!!
“Dying” languages is a great example for why we need OSS.. OSS gives people the freedom to have their own language if they want to do the work. What happens when you have to rely on Walmart or Microsoft for ALL your needs and they lock you out of the very languages you speak because it’s not “profitable” isn’t that really a pretty sad, bleek existance?
An an american, english speaker, i’ve noticed in the last 30 years or so, the increase of “made up” languages in fiction.. look at dune, or LOTR, Star Trek, Star Wars.. heck even teen fashion make up it’s own lingo. it seems collectivelly as a culture we’re so worn out on plain english we’re making stuff up just to get some intellectual stimulation!!! While at the same time we’re killing off REAL languages spoken for hundreds of years because we’re too busy to care about them.
It would be English. I come from an English speaking country and it is a pain in the ass. It is not flexible in the way you see. It is kinda like a tattered garment that people keep tacking new pieces onto. People who can’t speak or write English have a terrible time learning it. The rules of English grammar are inconsitant and stupid. The spelling is not phonetic. It is considered one of the hardest languages in the world to learn.
The reason English is so often used in the buisness world has nothing to do with flexibility and all to do with cultural Imperalism.
Frankly we English speaking people would be better off with speaking French or German.
As for keeping dead languages alive. Often one culture tries to kill another culture off by force. This often involves things such as changeing the language, forbidding cultural practices. This is basic oppression of people. Keeping some dying languages alive is a way to stop that oppression.
english is the most flexible language around especially when it comes to making up new words
So flexible that it has a single word for free ‘as in beer’ and free ‘as in freedom’ while all the other languages i speak have two words for those two different concepts.
Every language is a different way of thinking, and each allows for a better expression of some topics. English has some pretty nice particularities, but it is not specially the one superior language.
Business adoption of english has more to do with the USA having become a major influence than the particularities of the language itself. Had the US spoken spanish or french, then *that* would be the leading language today, for the same reasons.
“we don’t live in village times anymore and more and more kids will want to learn what most people speak.”
I don’t think that kids want to learn ‘what most people speak’. I mean most people speak Chinese! I really didn’t want to learn English in school but I had to. I also learnt (or was it learned?) German and Swedish in school. So I can speak three foreign languages and Finnish, my mother tongue. Without my English skills it would be real hard to say just to find information in the internet. More languages make things more complicated but saying that we should all speak English is dumb. How about you, have you ever learned any foreign languages aside from programming languages . I can say that learning a different language like English is hard and time consuming. English just doesn’t make any sense, German and Swedish are a lot easier languages to learn in my opinion.
“Spain will never promote Catalan because they promote spanish”
As you know, Catalan is a spanish language; you should have said “Castillian” (which is spain’s one-and-only official language. Catalan is only official in some spanish regions, but not in the whole kingdom of Spain.
IMO Catalan is far from being a dead language (and this is a good thing). Maybe its growing is stagnated, but there are a lot of public money and political efforts spent to keep it alive.
Have a good day / Bon dia
I usually avoid to get into rants specially here at OSNews but, frankly, I have to say it: those who thinks that everybody else should just dump his/her mother language and starts to speaks English are COMPLETELY AND CLUELESS IDIOTS.
Like most reasonable posters already pointed out, languages have more to do with identity and culture than anything else. You can’t just ignore everything that your siblings have been building for ages just to fit in a “global community”.
And also, someone already mentioned it, the most spoken language in the world is Mandarin alongside some other variation of Chinese, NOT English! What would you think if a Chinese told you to just forget English and start to talk Chinese?
Am I supposed to forget Brazilian Portuguese and start to improve my (limited) English skills in order to “simplificate” things a little bit in the world? Please, don’t take it as some sort of nationalistic pride speech or something like that, because honestly I’m not one of those people.
But seriously… If you agree with the assertion that I and the rest of the non-English speakers in the world should speak English, then I still think that you are a MORON, CLUELESS IDIOT and I can’t help it.
And also, someone already mentioned it, the most spoken language in the world is Mandarin alongside some other variation of Chinese, NOT English! What would you think if a Chinese told you to just forget English and start to talk Chinese?
While I agree that native and minority languages are important and should be preserved and promoted (I’m a linguist), this statement is incorrect, the way you said it here: English is in fact the most spoken language in the world. While Chinese is the most spoken native language, the most spoken language in the world (including non-native speakers) is English. India alone contributes to a huge chunk of non-native speakers of English (to varying degrees of fluency).
Again, I’m not an English imperialist. I speak six languages, including some that you’ve probably never heard before. But what you said, the way you said it is in fact incorrect.
You learn more about your native language while you learn a foreign one. If you never learned a foreign language you simply cannot judge about your own simply because you cannot behold it from a distance. While you learn a foreign language you’ll discover a lot of funny sounding words and figures of speech and you’ll be motivated to think how these are expressed in your own one. Every language have it’s own logic and represents different way of thinking. It is definitely a good thing to be able to look from different angles at the things around you.
As someone have said once: what know about english those who speek only english?
[i]The reason English is so often used in the buisness world has nothing to do with flexibility and all to do with cultural Imperalism.,/i>
Whatever, there are quite a few rigid languages that are not well adapted to making up new Technical terms (the source of a lot of new words created). I am not advocating that everyone speak English but it would be nice to have one standard language and often times English is the one that has been chosen. Its taut in nearly every European country(I rarely get to practice my German in Germany because English is so prevalent)and some asian countries like Japan. Keeping languages alive is great but your world gets really small when you only speak some obscure dialect that only 200 people around you speak.
Microsoft not allowing Icelanders to translate Windows 98 is absolutely atrocious! Here is the third part which is on available on the link you posted
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/soc.culture.nordic/browse_threa…
English manages to make up new technical terms through extensive borrowing from other languages whereas many other languages seem to do just fine conjuring up new terms without mixing “exotic” words and roots. Just because technical terms in English sound cool, new and exciting to you doesn’t suddenly mean that English is in any way more “flexible”; in fact, the borrowing would suggest otherwise.
Someone made the point that many languages can convey things that others cannot.
In the north, the Innuit have over 100 words for ‘snow’. This could be really helpful when you are travelling across icepacks, hunting in an area where you can see nothing but white for days.
Thankfully, the northerners are still isolated enough to not have been forcibly assimilated by the European Imperialists who stole their land. Others have not fared so well, despite making valiant efforts to save their culture.
Having governments keep you without the vote (1972 in Canada), in tiny (even compared to use, 300 acre per person, as opposed to 10 acres in Canada) reservations, where you lost your “status” as an individual with a specific culture (even worst, being robbed of the right to declare your own “status), is exactly the sort of colonial crap that leads to the eventual genocide of people’s across the globe.
http://www.ucalgary.ca/~kmuldrew/cryo_course/snow_words.html is a cool link showing the different ways to say snow.
However, the flip side is where the Nation as a whole spends ridiculous amounts of money “saving” the French language, and forcing it on every school child (since the 70’s) where it was not required; The french language in Quebec and other regions was surviving just fine on it’s own.
Instead, people have lost a basic Human right (freedom of expression) to language police in Quebec, where they are fined insane amounts of money for things like having an apostrophe in their business signage.
Somewhere inbetween are people who would really love to learn French, or Innu, or whatever language, just for the sake of expanding their minds and learning new cultures. But of course, it all gets politicized, and then peopel start to begrudge those that force it on others (20% of Canada forcing French on the other 80%. Just try to get a gov’t job if you don’t speak french. good luck.)
Now I know this will spark some flamage, but hey, sometimes the truth does that. All I’m saying is if people in Wales want to keep learning Welsh, go for it. But could you imagine if they forced Welsh on people in London in order to work for the Crown? Sheesh!
Found this that shows why the Inuit (vice the Innu, in the above post) have a supposedly huge lexicon of snow words.
Innu and Inuit are different peoples, just FYI.
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000405.html
where the heck do you people find keyboards?!
Too much drama for my taste… but, yes. It helps…
IMHO, free/documented formats are the most important thing to preserve anything about communication/culture… including spoken languages…
That’s cool! People are definitely happy to be able to use their own language.
My family is part-Scottish and my mom is an advanced learner of Scottish Gaelic. She’ll be very excited about this news — it’s always fun to see Gaelic supported in computer-land. I believe Google has been translated into Gaelic, actually.
I can’t wait for the plat Deutsch,Apache and African Pygmy localized versions.
Dont tell me, it’s already been done!
“where the heck do you people find keyboards?!”
I have found all of my keyboards from my home country, like everyone else. I guess that Gaelic speakers and writers don’t need any special keyboards because Gaelic doesn’t have any special charachters like å ä ö. But I’m not sure.
Open source only stays alive and active if there is enough interest in it, just like commercial software.
both will help cater to users of their software.. so i think it’s unlikely that it will be much different in terms of language the apps are in between commercial and FOSS.
why do people want to keep alive languages that will be dead soon?? It would be easier for everyone just to use english or german or something… mor elanguages complicates everything.
we don’t live in village times anymore and more and more kids will want to learn what most people speak.
keeping alive languages that are apart of history and traditional heritage is kinda dumb. It’s like how many native american languages are mostly dead but a few people still teach it to a few people and no one knows other than them and they speak english mostly anyway..
What an outrageously ignorant thing to say! Even if everyone decided “just to use english or german or something”, don’t you think that dialects would develop over time to produce new languages anyway? Not everyone on the planet has always-on broadband access for their minute-by-minute dose of the standard dialect of your chosen language, and even then I doubt that they would appreciate or respect the nannying necessary to have their every utterance be made conformant to that dialect.
Preventing languages from becoming extinct, aside from giving a lot of information about how languages evolve (and about the peoples and cultures which use them), helps to empower people who use such minority languages. Whilst I’m sure you’ve effortlessly learnt a dozen languages yourself, it’s incredibly arrogant and even oppressive to force communities to switch just so some inept bureaucracy can function slightly more conveniently.
Coming from wales I can’t really see the point of keeping a language alive other than for historical and research purposes. They spend a fortune on keeping welsh alive, money which could be spent on other cultural activities. In welsh schools students learn the names for scientific terms in welsh (invented by the language police), of course when they leave wales they have learn them all over again. Extreme minority languages are interesting and should be recorded both in written and in spoken form but I don’t understand why we spend so much money trying to keep them alive. It’s nothing to do with identity, compare wales and scotland. In scotland the language is pretty dead (compared to welsh) and yet scotland has a much more vibrant scottish culture than wales.
How about we spend money (presumably tax money) trying to keep alive some almost dead computer languages, eg Algol 58, Fortran I? Interesting historically but would be want these to be actually used by people in real jobs just for the sake of keeping them alive?
IMHO people who have ideas like tim h, wouldn’t say the same if it was his own language the one which was dissapearing.
I mean, i’m very happy to see that minor languages are given another chance thanks to open source software.
There is no better language we should all speak, all languages are equally respectable, in any case, even if they are spoken by very few people.
I speak Catalan, which is spoken by more than 5 million people, and so, it is far from dead, but as we don’t have an independent country, everything that is useful to extend its use, is great news for me. Spain will never promote Catalan because they promote spanish.
So great news for Gaelic, and great news for Catalan (which most Linux distributions support, and most open source software).
Of course we all remember how Microsoft refused to create an Icelandic version of windows 98, and wouldn’t let them do it themselves:
http://www.tungutaekni.is/ymis_frodleikur/war_of_words.html“ rel=”nofollow”>http://web.archive.org/web/20020910083318/