Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 9th Dec 2006 23:03 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 190347
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Ubuntu is debian with better dependency checking and a arguable nice look with more uptodate stuff.
No. Ubuntu is Debian with the exact same dependency checking, brown look, and with some stuff more up-to-date, some less up-to-date (when compared to Debian Testing & Unstable). Also, Ubuntu supports less architectures and much fewer packages -- Ubuntu's "universe" lacks security support.




Member since:
2005-07-06
From what I hear, Ubuntu's strength is in it's user friendliness. This isn't true.
Yes and No,Ubuntu is userfriendly but perhaps not as userfriendly as let's say SuSE or Mandriva.
Personally what intriques me is debian as base with apt-get package manager and 20000+ of apps .After all a PC that's standing in the corner doing nothing is useless.
Installing apps with apt-get is swift and painless.With yet questions being asked during install.For example wether you use ntfs or PAL and wether you live in Europe and thus don't need an USA channellist when installing for you TV card.
Ubuntu is debian with better dependency checking and a arguable nice look with more uptodate stuff.
And no matter what project keeps you busy at the moment,chances are significant someone has allready paved the right way to follow for you.There's a tremendoes amount of documentation,wikis,guides,howtos geared towards Ubuntu online.
Ubuntu isn't per se the best in class with any given subject but in my opinion is the easiest accessible best allround linux distro for the average end-user.
After Ubuntu you only have the BSD's and Gentoo if you want to dig deeper instead of just working with what's common usage.
Edited 2006-12-10 11:57