Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 13th Jan 2011 20:31 UTC
Internet & Networking And the fallout from Google's decision to drop H.264 support from its Chrome web browser continues to fall. Opera's Haavard - speaking on his own behalf - slammed the article which appeared on Ars Technica earlier today, while Micrsoft's Tim Sneath likened Google's move to the president of the United States banning English in favour of Esperanto. Also within, a rant (there's no other word for it) about the disrespect displayed by H.264 proponents towards the very open source community that saved and invigorated the web.
Thread beginning with comment 457750
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: My own opinion
by mutantsushi on Thu 13th Jan 2011 23:58 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: My own opinion"
mutantsushi
Member since:
2006-08-18

I guess I´m reaching beyond my expertise, but is there anything preventing the WebM CODEC from being used in another format (compatable with these other editors), at which point shifting to a different container is relatively simple/low-cost operation?

In any case, I believe Adobe will be supporting WebM fairly quickly, at which point other vendors will have pressure to follow suit (obiously, AVID is a different case). The YouTube tie-in is what gives WebM more of a ´beneficient aura´ than simply the new container Matroska offered. I guess all I can say if you´re worried about fragmentation... start bitching to Adobe and other developers to start supporting WebM! :-)

(and BTW, thanks for sharing your perspective of ´it´s got to work good in my real-life eco-system´, without that kind of dose of reality, we get open-source stuff like the GIMP)

Reply Parent Score: 3