Post a Comment
They released specs and have been workin with Novell to get opensource drivers out to users. You want to give you a reach around as well? For years everyone complains about lack of specs and AMD delivers and now people complain that AMD didn't opensource their propietary drivers. The specs should be moe than enough, imo. Its more than Nvidia has done.
Then do some research before you dare spread FUD..
Intel, AMD and now VIA have all released either docs or drivers... Nvidia is the only one holding out.
AMD:
http://www.x.org/wiki/radeon
http://www.x.org/wiki/radeonhd
http://www.radeonhd.org/
http://www.x.org/docs/AMD/
http://developer.amd.com/documentation/guides/Pages/default.aspx#op...
Intel stuff:
http://intellinuxgraphics.org/
Via stuff:
http://linux.via.com.tw/support/downloadFiles.action
http://www.x.org/docs/via/
http://www.openchrome.org/
You fail at life Adurbe.. just like Adobe fails at business.
Edited 2008-11-21 01:00 UTC
You fail at life Adurbe.. just like Adobe fails at business.
I'll happily continue to 'fail' like a multi billion dollar company :-)
Indeed, if I manage to even get close to that level of 'failure' I'll be happy!
FYI incase there was any misunderstanding, Adurbe isnt a derivitive of adobe its the latin Ad Urbe
I had a Chrome9 chipset before my last motherboard upgrade. This not being the first time VIA has made noises about opening up, the OpenChrome devs were quite skeptical this round. However, it looks like we may be seeing the beginnings of an open dialog. Though it looks like VIA's internal documentation situation is, shall we say, less than optimal. This should be interesting to watch:
http://wiki.openchrome.org/pipermail/openchrome-devel/2008-November...
Edited 2008-11-20 14:37 UTC
Based on this, I think VIA is really trying to become open.
Committed over 16,000 lines of code to kernel
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NjQ2Nw



