Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 7th Jun 2006 18:39 UTC
Intel At a Computex event today, Intel officially unveiled its 965 Express chipset (the P965, codenamed 'Broadwater') for use with its forthcoming line of Core 2 Duo processors. The company confirmed the accelerated launch schedule for the Core 2 rollout: Woodcrest (a Xeon replacement) in June, Conroe (for desktops) in July, and Merom (for laptops) in August. There's also an ultra low voltage Merom in the works for use in very thin portables from Dell and HP.
Order by: Score:
just Dell and HP
by bryanv on Wed 7th Jun 2006 19:09 UTC
bryanv
Member since:
2005-08-26

Oh yeah, like Apple isn't going to go for a piece of that action in the next year or two.

Reply Score: 0

Ultra Low Voltage?
by Nathan O. on Wed 7th Jun 2006 19:17 UTC
Nathan O.
Member since:
2005-08-11

How low are we talking? Am I going to have noticably longer battery life with one of these? That's way, way, waaay more important to me than speed. 5 year old CPUs are plenty fast for the vast majority of workloads.

Reply Score: 2

RE: Ultra Low Voltage?
by ThanhLy on Wed 7th Jun 2006 19:36 UTC in reply to "Ultra Low Voltage?"
ThanhLy Member since:
2006-03-14

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mobile/display/20060419102723.html

The Core Solo ULV chips consume 5.5 watts. Although not the same as the Core 2 Duo ULV, it does give you an idea of "how low."

Reply Score: 3

RE[2]: Ultra Low Voltage?
by Nathan O. on Wed 7th Jun 2006 19:44 UTC in reply to "RE: Ultra Low Voltage?"
Nathan O. Member since:
2005-08-11

Thanks for the link!

Personally, I'd like to see another chip that focuses more on power savings. Looks like the Core Solo uses more juice than the Pentium M. I hope the Core 2 starts a different trend.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Ultra Low Voltage?
by IsaacB on Wed 7th Jun 2006 21:40 UTC in reply to "Ultra Low Voltage?"
IsaacB Member since:
2006-05-31

Over at Engadget they say the ULV version will sip 0.75W, and the non-ULV, "one to two watts". Sounds pretty incredible to me.

Reply Score: 2

EMT64
by bonjour on Wed 7th Jun 2006 20:40 UTC
bonjour
Member since:
2005-07-12

finally!! going to get a quare core mac pro with 64 bit capabilities, dual sli i hope

Reply Score: 1

RE: EMT64
by Dark_Knight on Thu 8th Jun 2006 13:13 UTC in reply to "EMT64"
Dark_Knight Member since:
2005-07-10

While you're correct that Merom (mobile Core Duo) processor will provide EMT64 it will be dual core, not quad core. The quad core processor when developed will be released for the server line. Maybe in another year we may see a quad core mobile solution for laptops.

Reply Score: 1

64bit
by Eugenia on Wed 7th Jun 2006 20:40 UTC
Eugenia
Member since:
2005-06-28

I think these cpus are also 64bit, right? If yes, I am all for a new Macbook.

Reply Score: 1

RE: 64bit
by smitty on Wed 7th Jun 2006 21:25 UTC in reply to "64bit"
smitty Member since:
2005-10-13

Yes, and it appears to be a better implementation than the P4 had.

Reply Score: 2

RE: 64bit
by bonjour on Wed 7th Jun 2006 21:38 UTC in reply to "64bit"
bonjour Member since:
2005-07-12

definitely 64 bit capable, the EMT64 instructions are included at least in the conroe (desktop version), not sure if it's needed in laptop, you don't necessarily need to address much more than 4 GB of memory for a laptop is my guess, especially if you want good battery life.

http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/06/05/first_benchmarks_conroe_vs_f...

take a look at the pic from tomshardware from a cpu-z output

i wonder how pissed off the super computer folks at Virginia Tech are now that their xserves are 5x slower and generate much more heat. for those of you that want used g5 xserves, you'll probably be able to get them discounted very soon. muhahahha

Reply Score: 2

Is it worth...
by Anonymous Penguin on Wed 7th Jun 2006 20:50 UTC
Anonymous Penguin
Member since:
2005-07-06

Replacing my Pentium D 920 for one of those?
Maybe it is, but not immediately as they come out.

Reply Score: 1

chipset voltage
by jcinacio on Wed 7th Jun 2006 22:05 UTC
jcinacio
Member since:
2006-03-12

Too bad the chipsets supporting the new core2 will be consuming more watts (arround 23-24W).

It's funny that when everyone keeps talking about the Performance/Watt ratio of the CPU's, the chipsets that support them are forgotten and their power just keeps going up.

Reply Score: 5

affordable personal supercomputer?
by mipeligro on Thu 8th Jun 2006 06:52 UTC
mipeligro
Member since:
2006-06-03

I just hope Tyan figures out how to use things things. It'd be cool to have a Tyan personal supercomputer, but not $10k worth of cool.

Reply Score: 1

Looking forward...
by kaiwai on Thu 8th Jun 2006 07:05 UTC
kaiwai
Member since:
2005-07-06

Looking forward to seeing an Arstechnica artical explaining the technology that Intel used vs. AMD using strained silicon and others licenced off IBM.

It would be nice to see Intel finally start using that much hyped CSI which is, according to Intel, mean to be the Hypertransport killer.

Reply Score: 1