"What follows is a list of the APIs that the current Linux Flash Player 9 development version is using. I debated whether it was appropriate to publish this information. Then I remembered that anyone who knows what they're doing should be able to figure this stuff out by themselves anyway once the final Player is released."
Post a Comment
Member since:
2005-08-22
Member since:2005-11-14
Member since:
2005-12-18
Member since:2005-07-07
Member since:2006-02-16
Member since:
2005-07-22
Member since:2005-07-07
Member since:2005-12-15
flash isnt necessary for youtube: http://blog.whats-your.name/post/2006/07/16/youtube-without-flash and everything else is just annoying ads, so..i dont see the point. nobody is going to write an app in FLEX unless its some proprietary intranet where they can control the installation...
Member since:2005-06-29
There's a VideoDownloader plugin for FireFox, and I think there might be at least one other alternative that provides the ability to download the videos off Google Videos, YouTube and some other sites without having to use flash player.
I haven't actually tried it yet, but it aught to be worth a try if you watch videos on either of the two sites.
Member since:2005-07-13
I still don't get it. Who uses flash today? Advertisers? Marketing? Why are people so interested in having the last Flash player version? It's slow, and makes any internet site unusable. I (and not only me) just turn to other site when I find some flash based site.
Flash can be abused, but it has a number of business applications. We use it for for webinars and training material, for instance. It saves our customers and suppliers from having to install additional components or add-ons, which isn't always possible or straight forward for them.
Deployed as a front-end for server or web-based services, it can be a much more effective and easier-to-work-with platform-agnostic interface than ajax or java-based ones. This is one of the areas Adobe is banking on making some big money in terms of development tools.
It's not perfect, but it's pretty much become a de facto standard and it "just works" as long as you have a browser.
And Windows, for now anyways.
Member since:2006-07-26
Some need to create a unique experience.
Some need to push video content to as many users as possible(NYTimes, Guba.com, etc.) Some need to display captions along with these videos such as case studies, tutorials, presentations, newscasts.
Some need to build once, display in various segments(Kiosks, PSP, DVD, CD, Mobile) and other platforms seamlessly.
Some need total control over every element in an environment that surpasses HTML(AJAX included).
---
There's a huge, active and supportive community that continues to grow around Flash Technology. With a healthy ecosystem, businesses are adapting and starting to offer services and technologies around it (BrightCove.com, Code.tv(fp8^) and here is one for you UnitedVirtualities.com(fp8^)). There is even a huge OpenSource community(osflash.org).
There's a new shift happening with the release of AS3 (ActionScript 3.0), a fully ECMA compliant language with an approx. speed increase of 10x for code execution. I won't be suprised if even more developers follow suit with this and FLEX2, gone are the days of staring at a timeline.
Flash is not the end to all with delivering content just yet, however it has been making in roads from day one -- what started out as a basic tool for animation has grown into a solid option for developing next gen. applications.
Member since:2005-08-02
Member since:
2005-07-22
video.google.com and youtube.com use flash for video playback. I just use flashblock:
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/
that way I can play flash movies and stuff without having to view flash ads.
Member since:
2005-07-22
Member since:2006-07-06
"You're just being and ideological idiot. I expect you're deluded that linux is easy to use too."
Nice troll. Short, insulting, to the point.
This is OSnews, by the way. If you're really serious about this linux-is-easy-to-use-delusion thing, I suggest you update your bookmarks to www.digg.com.
And on a side note, yes, youtube is the coolest thing that happened on my computer since napster. And it works flawlessly with flash 7 in any distro I've cared to try.
Member since:2006-01-09
And on a side note, yes, youtube is the coolest thing that happened on my computer since napster.
Agreed
And it works flawlessly with flash 7 in any distro I've cared to try.
Works? Yes. Flawlessly? Not quite. The famous A/V sync bug will shows itself when you try to have som fun at Youtube.
Member since:2006-06-19
Member since:2005-08-22
Try playing Dance Dance Karnov under Linux. The audio is horribly out of sync, making it completely unplayable.
http://www.somethingawful.com/features/dancedancekarnov/index.htm
Member since:2006-02-01
And on a side note, yes, youtube is the coolest thing that happened on my computer since napster. And it works flawlessly with flash 7 in any distro I've cared to try.
Really? Give it a shot on any architecture that isn't i386. And that situation isn't likely to change for a while either, as apparently even Flash 9 for Linux won't have an AMD64 version.
That's why we need an open-source Flash, not all that ideological stuff.
Member since:2005-06-30
It can be an useful alternative to video streaming...
Given the impressive installation base of the Flash player (according to a NPD report: 98%, in reality: probably around 90%), you can set up preview movies without having to bother with different formats (mainly WMV, RM and QT). The video codec coming with Flash 8 (On VP6) is quite good, even at limited bitrates.
My department is going to promote the accomplishments of our students by making some of the best filmed demonstrations available on the Internet. While a link to an high-quality XviD movie will only be a click away, we know that most people will be able to enjoy the demonstrations without hunting for codecs, including many Linux users (like myself). Furthermore, it will save us some bandwidth since most people are going to be satisfied with the lower-resolution previews.
While an open-source solution would have been favoured, you just cannot ignore your audience... In our case, they are mostly Windows users. Our goal is promotion: asking people to download codecs for viewing the contents would go against it. Note that I am a huge fan of Xiph (my whole music library is in OGG), but the Theora format is still alpha.
It might not be a revolution, but it can be quite handy. Perhaps not for you, but for us.
Member since:2005-07-12
Member since:
2005-12-05
Member since:
2005-07-22
"Am I missing something important/revolutionary? 
Yes. The important thing is: not everyone thinks the same things you do."
I would call internet revolutionary, not to some way of delivering homemade videos. You are giving it too much importance.
"While it would be nice for youtube and google video etc. to post their videos in a real video format (e.g. XviD/MP3), they don't. People still want to watch them. Therefore they need flash"
They don't "need" flash.
"Anyway I digress. You obviously knew all that. You're just being and ideological idiot. I expect you're deluded that linux is easy to use too."
Ofcourse I knew all that. It's just I prefer to download movies and series with bittorrent and watch that instead of homemade low-quality ones.
And I'm not an idiot. It happens that I see all this flash ads and sites polluting the web and I don't like it.
I find Linux easy to use for my needs. I don't expect most people to use it. In fact, I don't care if their PCs explode because of malware, as much as I don't get affected. Really, as much as I don't get affected I don't care what people does. I happen to care when I get affected by people's idiocy.
Member since:2005-12-31
Member since:2006-07-26
"While it would be nice for youtube and google video etc. to post their videos in a real video format (e.g. XviD/MP3), they don't. People still want to watch them. Therefore they need flash"
You can download xvid versions of videos on google from their player if not directly from the web. I think there is or used to be links on the right side of the page for that.
Member since:2006-07-26
"While it would be nice for youtube and google video etc. to post their videos in a real video format (e.g. XviD/MP3), they don't. People still want to watch them. Therefore they need flash"
You can download xvid versions of videos on google from their player if not directly from the web. I think there is or used to be links on the right side of the page for that.
Member since:
2005-07-22
I don't see how anyone can "draw" a GUI with flash and make a business application with it more easily than with HTML. It's a designers tool, not a programmers tool. And I know what I'm talking about because I evaluated flash as an alternative method to create visual interfaces for the web. It's hard, not standard (checkout SVG/SMIL for this) and requires a plugin. I expect a business applications to be simple and easy to use, not an animated show colors.
Member since:2006-07-25
"It's a designers tool, not a programmers tool."
I might have agreed with you on this on Flash 4, and maybe 5 and 6.
But once AS2 hit with flash 7 (2004), there are actionscript compilers, drawing APIs, etc. for making swfs without ever touching the IDE.
Flash is suitable for both designer and programmer, and is a darn fine tool at both.
HTML has it's place in some cases, but it's just not up to the task of any sort of engaging experience. Subtle effects and animations are a nice addition to many an app. Just the freedom of visual cues you can make is so liberating after dealing with the usual HTML/CSS/JS day in and day out.
Not every app needs to be plain looking.
Flash offers some very rapid development time and also somw nice eye candy (if you want it) to boot without much fuss at all.
Member since:
2005-06-29
While Flash is proprietary and I hate it, it is important. The internet is becoming multimedia oriented and Flash is a big part of the multimedia equation. Demos, movies, tutorials, websites and games are increasingly created with Flash. I even use Flash for my own demos because it has high quality free authoring tools. Plus about 90% of browsers are Flash enabled. Denying the importance of Flash is premature. Hopefully, there will be a good "free" implementation before long.
Member since:2005-12-31
"Hopefully, there will be a good "free" implementation before long."
What your looking for is here: http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/
Beware it's still under heavy development.
Member since:2005-12-13
Member since:2005-06-30
To my knowledge, FFMPEG can encode movies in the Sorenson Spark format, used by Flash 7. Given it can encode, I guess its counterpart, libavcodec, can decode...
As long as gnash can use gstreamer (since I doubt the FSF would add support for a closed format in a GNU project), I am pretty sure it will be able to support it -- once it's in a usable state, anyway.
Member since:2005-12-31
What exactly is a "proprietary flash video"?
Anyways, I think you should read the GPL again. To violate it, a player would have to link against code contained in a flash animation (definition of linking is rather vague in the GPL; especially visible in this case) *and* you'd have to distribute the linked whole to others (you're not going to do that). So I don't think there'd be a problem.
Member since:2005-12-31
Member since:
2005-10-18
Member since:
2006-06-19
Member since:
2006-03-10
When it comes to embedding video - and audio - content on the web, a legion of developers thank the good lord for Flash on a regular basis.
When you have a media-file you want to serve up to your public, you have three choices:
1) Open it directly (not embedded in a page), thereby letting the user's OS figure out how to play it. Line of least resistance, passing the buck; not terribly 'seamless'.
2) Attempt to embed it by using pages and pages of tortuous Javascript detection to guess what OS, browser and media-plugin the user has. Pain... lots of pain.
3) Drag and drop it into a Flash movie, and embed the Flash in the page. Just works, and is pretty agnostic insofar as it supports reams of mainstream video formats.
Nevermind the hi-end proprietary video delivery applications e.g YouTube et al, at the simplest level it's the easiest and most consistent way to get that content seen by the most users.
I am not employed/bribed by Adobe.
Member since:
2005-11-15
Member since:
2005-11-15
Member since:
2006-02-09
Member since:
2005-12-04
Member since:2005-07-07
Member since:
2006-01-26
Member since:
2005-07-29
why the hell use flash? flash is slow and propietary.if you use other technologies your web page/game/proyect could be used in any computer, in any OS but if you use flash are tied to only x86 and windows.because other OSs included linux not have full flash implementation only partial
or nothing at all
Member since:
2005-12-04
Or wait for the FreeBSD developers to port ALSA to FreeBSD, the FreeBSD kernel is GPL compatible anyway
why would they do that? OSS works great. the only thing ALSA would be needed for is flash player, and i don't think they usually add huge things like that to the kernel just to make one closed-source program work.
we wouldn't even have this problem if linux could do OSS right.