Post a Comment
Yeah, I tried it, it sucked.
I'd rather install a _real_ shell on my system that won't require some stupid web browser that requires a specific requirement of OS, etc.
I mean, come on. Now I don't just require an OS to run a browser, but I need a specific level of browser that requires a specific level of OS.
This whole requiring a new platform indirection layer to abstract the OS is a load of crap.
hmm....people are throw around the term Operating System for pretty much anything these days.
A framework is not an operating system.
A window manager is not an operating system
A framework and window manager developed on top of a web browser is definitely not an operating system.
But it still looks like an interesting project. I guess they will learn alot about javascript and 'WEB 2.0' app development.
Of course, it is not a real operating system, it is only a draft, but I don't think that the idea of transforming a web browser into an universal tool a mad or useless idea.
It follows the tradition of Lisp Machines and Smalltalk where the underlying OS is completely abstracted out, as well as the hardware is hidden behind a virtual
machine, here the virtual machine is inside a web browser. If a program is complete enough to do everything that an OS can do, it is, for the user, an OS. You can imagine that you run a Mac emulator full screen on your windows box. The user will assume that the computer is running MacOS even if it does not actually control the hardware.
Maybe the main problem is that Javascript is not -so far- a proper language for OS development.



