Linked by Rahul on Fri 31st Oct 2008 16:08 UTC
Post a Comment
I was going to ask that you link to "your" previous articles mentioned in the post ("Back in July we shared..."), but then I realized that you lifted the paragraph from phoronix and the previous articles were written by them. In the future, could you please indicate this in the news item? For example, "Phoronix writes, 'Back in July...'"
RE: Links to previous articles, attribution
by Rahul on Fri 31st Oct 2008 21:41 UTC
in reply to "Links to previous articles, attribution"
Honestly, Plymouth is not where Linux developers need to be wasting their time.
Come on. I see my system's boot screen for a couple of seconds, once a day. If it flickers or not, big deal.
There are *way* more important parts of the system that need reworking that should have higher priority.
Just my $0.02
Honestly, Plymouth is not where Linux developers need to be wasting their time.
Come on. I see my system's boot screen for a couple of seconds, once a day. If it flickers or not, big deal.
There are *way* more important parts of the system that need reworking that should have higher priority.
Just my $0.02
Come on. I see my system's boot screen for a couple of seconds, once a day. If it flickers or not, big deal.
There are *way* more important parts of the system that need reworking that should have higher priority.
Just my $0.02
I agree. But they're trying to target Linux based operating systems at the unwashed masses. The unwashed masses are complete drooling idiots that have no clue about pretty much anything. It is not about improving anything, it is just about looking "cool".




