Post a Comment
Today there's been more people voting down legit comments than normal and then voting up troll posts, the same happened just minutes ago in the KDE article that's up two from this one on the main page.
I really hope whoever maintains the site does something to fix this, I strongly believe that some people have multiple accounts and are using those to abuse the voting system.
>>who in their right mind would WANT an intel based mac? go buy a dell...
Compare this http://www.cheapcomputerdeal.com/images/dell%20pc.jpg
to this http://images.apple.com/macmini/gallery/images/hands20050111.jpg
Any questions?
Here, I found this in two seconds using Google. Anybody who wants to connect their Mac mini to their TV can spend a whopping $19 and then shut the f--k up.
http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore?product...
I believe I already answered this.
http://www.osnews.com/permalink.php?news_id=12567&comment_id=57648
>>who in their right mind would WANT an intel based mac? go buy a dell...
Compare this http://www.cheapcomputerdeal.com/images/dell%20pc.jpg
to this http://images.apple.com/macmini/gallery/images/hands20050111.jpg
Any questions?
- Yes, her hands ARE Prettier.
yes, How much is the monitor included in the Dell?
And I prefer this dell: http://news.designtechnica.com/images/stories/2005/9/8408/XPS_200.j...
Sorry for my bad English.
Not until there's plenty of software. A year is *barely* enough time for the transition.
Apple is almost certainly rolling out prorotypes right now -- and I'm sure it runs great -- but I'd be very surprised if they actually begin selling any before june, because June is when they TOLD the software devs they'd be delivering.
It will have have been more like about half a year really. That being said, from what I've heard most major companies are already mostly done. Some smaller devs may end up having to wait until they have their own IntelliMacs to test on as not everyone can afford a test machine.
With the exclusion of the major players (like Adobe), there are 3rd applications that have already been compiled for both PowerPC and x86. To see this, from OS X 10.4.3, "Get Info" on any application, and then choose "More info". There, it should list the "Architecture[s]" that the application has been compiled for. Although the majority of my apps state PowerPC, there are a couple (BBEdit, CuberDuck) that show PowerPC, x86.
With the exclusion of the major players (like Adobe), there are 3rd applications that have already been compiled for both PowerPC and x86. To see this, from OS X 10.4.3, "Get Info" on any application, and then choose "More info". There, it should list the "Architecture[s]" that the application has been compiled for. Although the majority of my apps state PowerPC, there are a couple (BBEdit, CuberDuck) that show PowerPC, x86.
- FileMaker Pro 8, isn't ready yet.
Just PowerPC.
The Mac mini and iBook make the most sense for the early release. For most of the consumer uses targeted by them, they use Apple's own software(iTunes, Safari, iPhoto, etc), which are either native, or will be native by launch, and don't really have to worry about big applications being ready.
The demons of redmond are waiting for this moment,
for the moment Apple comes to x86,
so they can market their software,
on yet another platform
"Fresh souls" one of the demons will howl to another
"Yes, and some old ones who knew our ways"
Both nod to each other while wiping each other's ass with a stack of crisp twenties.
"Now they will all fall in line" muses the first
"And they will forget about the penguin"
The two demons chuckle as the first tosses a chair to keep the fires of hell burning.
I'm confused.
Oher than Access and FrontPage what applications that MS makes large dollar amounts from are not already available on the Mac?
Are you suggesting that this is an opportunity for them to sell Windows to run on MacTel machines? I think if people are going to install Windows on their shiny new Intel Macs it will be from disks they already own rather than brand new copies. I won't even SUGGEST that people might install illicit copies.
Well, they can offer "amnesty" to all those illicit copy users and get $20 for each illegal copy - multiplied by how many illegal copy users out there? - Big Bucks!
Now to mention that MS has site license agreements which now just cover x86 dell, hp, compaq etc hardware. Image if they charged *more* for a site license if the site has x86 macs which could run windows -- just a thought
...that they will be here for January. But didn't Intel say that Yonah won't even be ready until then, at least? So if that is the case, they cannot be building Mactel mini's with Yonahs... I'll wait, if this all comes to pass, until April, when I think they will really be released.
But if they come in January, I am selling my dogs and cat and parrots (I'll keep the wife and kids) and buying one!
RE: I so badly want to believe...
I have put off buying a new machine in anticipation of dual booting Windows and OSX on the same box. If Apple releases a x86 laptop with a decent graphics chip at MacWorld in January, they can expect to have my monetary support. It would also be the first Mac I've ever purchased ...
Thank you for whoever modded down "Anonymous". Not sure why people feel the need to do more than comment about the presented article or information contained therein.
People, if you disagree with something someone comments on ABOUT THE ARTICLE then voice your opinion. Provide REASONS for your disagreement.
Comments like "That's stupid!" "Yonah is a joke!" are useless and meaningless. Further, attacking the writer of a comment is neither polite nor necessary, nor is it supported by the rules of this news board.
Sorry for my "rant". I am probably guilty of this at times as well, but at least I generally recognize it and try to rectify it.





.