Post a Comment
I'm sure Vista simply does wonders with the battery.
Seriously, the biggest problem with these UMPCs, is the OS. I couldn't think of a more inappropriate system to run on a battery constrained, screen constrained, keyboard constrained, speed constrained, hard disk constrained, RAM constrained system.
That's not accounting for the fact that the average user wouldn't know how to strip the system down and remove the tray icons and all that jazz.
That was my first thought. But not just Haiku, any OS. After being burnt by Amiga, I moved to BeOS on Intel because I knew that if BeOS did not work out I would have a number of other OSes to try.
I notice that it only had flash memory for it's drive. virtual memory can be a killer for flash memory. Aside from Windows and BeOS/Haiku which I know you can disable VM. Do any other OSes including Linux allow you to turn off VM?
Maybe it's just me, but I can't consider a 1.33 Ghz Core Solo + 1 Gb of RAM a constrained system. That should be enough to run Vista, but I agree that it could perform way better with any other OS out there.
Just like the PSP, it's an interesting device, and just like the PSP I bet the battery life doesn't stand long enough.
Edit: Almost 4 hours? Hey, it's not that bad!
Edited 2007-04-09 18:47 UTC
RE[2]: Really could use
"We managed 3 hours and 40 minutes of battery life under normal working conditions, which included wireless Web surfing, exploring the features of Vista, and snapping the occasional photo or two. We even managed to view a few streamed videos, which looked great on the little widescreen display"
http://www.laptopmag.com/Review/Sony-VAIO-UX-Premium-VGN-UX390N.htm
"We managed 3 hours and 40 minutes of battery life under normal working conditions, which included wireless Web surfing, exploring the features of Vista, and snapping the occasional photo or two. We even managed to view a few streamed videos, which looked great on the little widescreen display"
3:40 isn't bad. But it's a shame that it's so pricey.
It's amazing how Sony relentlessly throws money and R&D at vague markets. First they tried the tablet PC and scrapped them, now they're trying this. Vaio coolness factor aside, one possibly could be better served by a decent smartphone or an iPhone.
And the price is just ridiculous.
Edited 2007-04-09 19:05
just me but wouldnt such a small form factor with limited hardware, etc run a zippy low resource OS like Linux...be a better choice? Just slap on some homemade open source apps which I am sure Sony could do onto that bad boy...so you wont need to use Vista and watch that thing sell like hotcakes.
I think for most people text entry is pretty important. Even if just using a computer for email and web browsing, a poor keyboard can make the experience pretty unpleasant. Slow text entry may not be such an issue with a glorified organiser, or if I'm just storing contacts and texting on a phone, but if that's all I wanted I wouldn't spend $2449.
Personally I wouldn't want to use a built in keyboard like that for more than a few sentences. Trying to type an essay or write a program would be an exercise in frustration. Most tiny portable PCs that I've seen have similarly poor keyboards, and to me it's a crippling limitation.
Psion managed to fit a decent little keyboard on their pocket sized Revo palmtop back in the late 90s. Yet on a computer that's much more advanced (and much more expensive), you get flat buttons that would be more at home on a cheap mobile phone or pocket calculator.
I suppose you could plug in an external keyboard, but you can't carry one around with you without making it a lot less portable.
Even with those rubber keyboards you're pretty much doubling the amount of space the device takes up. It also makes it a lot more hassle to set up somewhere, for example if you quickly want to use it on your lap when in a taxi. A decent built in keyboard, one that you can use while still holding the device, would be far better.
Plus those rubber keyboards remind me of my old ZX Spectrum's keyboard, and that doesn't bring back good memories of fast and comfortable typing...
Port Replicator - 1 4-pin i.LINK interface, 3 USB 2.0, Ethernet, VGA-Out, A/V-out
To my logic, the smaller (and therefore often more expensive) a computer is, the more likely it will be connected to a high quality, space saving LCD display.
It is also a fact that a digital connection is absolutely the best way to connect a digital monitor.
So why is it that, even though you can find a DVI connector in almost all current LCD displays, many smaller computers only have a legacy VGA connector?
Does Sony really think that a customer, who first shells out $2,500 for this ultra small/modern/expensive 'gadget', then goes home and connects it to his/her old bulky CRT?!
Personally, even if I could afford it, I would never buy this device for the lack of a DVI connection alone.
There's no real need for a DVI connection. What do you intend to use the handheld for, that would absolutely need DVI? Graphical work? High-performance gaming? Come, now.
For day to day use, the vast majority of LCD's come with both a DVI-VGA cable as well as a DVI-DVI cable. Whether a VGA to DVI conversion wields any detectable decrease in image quality and/or performance is debatable. Realistically, it doesn't make that much of a difference, for ordinary usage.
And if you consider that handhelds have very limited physical space, you'll see why providing only a VGA connector makes more sense than providing only DVI or both DVI and VGA.
There's no real need for a DVI connection. What do you intend to use the handheld for, that would absolutely need DVI? Graphical work? High-performance gaming? Come, now.
Well, first off this "handheld" happens to have the specs of a real computer (it even comes with Vista).
Second, with the port replicator it can become a full desktop computer and thus is not *just* a handheld *anymore*. No, after that it becomes a full-blown Desktop machine complete with your favorite Desktop apps.
With Vista, its performance and having only 32GB of internal storage can be a problem though. But if you install a Linux distro on it you'd have enough performance and space left for normal Desktop computing. Also an USB hard disk could help with space problems.
I really like the idea of this device. A computer so small that you can easily take it *anywhere* and still use all you normal desktop apps.
For day to day use, the vast majority of LCD's come with both a DVI-VGA cable as well as a DVI-DVI cable. Whether a VGA to DVI conversion wields any detectable decrease in image quality and/or performance is debatable. Realistically, it doesn't make that much of a difference, for ordinary usage.
You don't need to be a graphics designer to appreciate good image quality. I've found that DVI can make a big and noticeable difference in the clarity of text, for example. It will not help games much I believe.
And if you consider that handhelds have very limited physical space, you'll see why providing only a VGA connector makes more sense than providing only DVI or both DVI and VGA.
But providing only a DVI connector doesn't take much space. Internally it could take even less space since there would be no need for Digital to Analog converters.
Sony could offer a DVI to VGA converter as an optional accessory for those who need it. OR if the device still has the DA converters an adapter would be enough.
Edited 2007-04-10 14:47


