Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 1st Oct 2007 19:35 UTC, submitted by zizban
Post a Comment
RE: I object to the term Risc OS on Linux
by Kroc (5.32) on Mon 1st Oct 2007 20:57 UTC in reply to "I object to the term Risc OS on Linux"
RE[2]: I object to the term Risc OS on Linux
by MYOB (2) on Mon 1st Oct 2007 21:02 UTC in reply to "RE: I object to the term Risc OS on Linux"
RE: I object to the term Risc OS on Linux
by John Blink (1.84) on Tue 2nd Oct 2007 08:33 UTC in reply to "I object to the term Risc OS on Linux"
RE[2]: I object to the term Risc OS on Linux
by stestagg (2.92) on Fri 5th Oct 2007 10:36 UTC in reply to "RE: I object to the term Risc OS on Linux"
I'd like to see how this progresses during Beta. My biggest worries are fundamental "Linux-isms" plaguing the design in the final product. A Linux WM with a RISC OS skin, RISC OS does not make. RISC OS is a good OS because the way it is designed from the ground up. I wish them the best in creating something that maintains the innovative and fun process behind RISC OS.
... I turned on my A7000 the other day. Then I shut it down again, happy in the knowledge I can leave it off for another 6 months and not feel like I never use it anymore. If anybody can source me an RISCPC ethernet card dead cheap, maybe I'd use it more often though ;-)









