Linked by David Adams on Wed 2nd Jul 2008 19:28 UTC, submitted by snydeq
Internet & Networking Microsoft has responded to a recent challenge from Sun to answer some serious questions about Hyper-V â€" in particular, how Hyper-V can compete with Xen-based alternatives, and whether a Windows-only virtualization technology can hack it in today's increasingly heterogeneous datacenters.
Order by: Score:

short answer...
by helf on Wed 2nd Jul 2008 22:29 UTC
helf
Member since:
2005-07-06

Yes.

It's a MS product. They will keep at it till they wear everyone down and take over ;)

Comment by MrEs
by MrEs on Wed 2nd Jul 2008 23:09 UTC
MrEs
Member since:
2008-04-02

I don't think heterogeneous-ity comes into it really...

At my current work place we wouldn't use anything other then a MS products as we're a Gold Partners; So we'll be using HyperV without doubt.

My last work place was a Debian shop so we were using Xen...

I really think it's as simple as that, 'Microsoft shops' will use HyperV, where as 'Linux shops' will use Xen... Much like the OSes the both have their advantages and there will be lots of HyperV bashing as it's from Microsoft. Xen was amazing to use both had a very steep learning curve :\

RE: Comment by MrEs
by rjamorim on Thu 3rd Jul 2008 02:17 UTC in reply to "Comment by MrEs"
rjamorim Member since:
2005-12-05

I really think it's as simple as that, 'Microsoft shops' will use HyperV, where as 'Linux shops' will use Xen...


OK, but what about heterogeneous shops that use both Windows and Linux, and maybe even BSD and Solaris? These are the shops being addressed in the question, not shops that are commited to a single platform.

RE[2]: Comment by MrEs
by bert64 on Thu 3rd Jul 2008 08:41 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by MrEs"
bert64 Member since:
2007-04-23

It's likely that shops with both windows and linux will use vmware if they need it's features, or xen because it's free. I don't really see a place for Hyper-V anywhere that's not totally locked in to microsoft... It's not tried and tested like the other products, it has a large footprint and will cost more than xen.
Not even sure if it offers much above vmware's free products either.

The only places that will use it, are those who are locked to 100% microsoft and cant/wont touch anything else.

RE[3]: Comment by MrEs
by MSandLinuxandMACsuck on Thu 3rd Jul 2008 14:32 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by MrEs"
MSandLinuxandMACsuck Member since:
2008-07-03

I have not tested it but it has a larger footprint? Oy. More myths to debunk. I run it on Server 2008 Core config and it has hardly any footprint.

RE[2]: Comment by MrEs
by BluenoseJake on Thu 3rd Jul 2008 16:00 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by MrEs"
BluenoseJake Member since:
2005-08-11

OK, but what about heterogeneous shops that use both Windows and Linux, and maybe even BSD and Solaris? These are the shops being addressed in the question, not shops that are commited to a single platform.


They'll use vmware

RE: Comment by MrEs
by Soulbender on Thu 3rd Jul 2008 09:37 UTC in reply to "Comment by MrEs"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

I really think it's as simple as that, 'Microsoft shops' will use HyperV, where as 'Linux shops' will use Xen...


Except for those shops that are mixed, which are many,

Comment by bproven2
by bproven2 on Wed 2nd Jul 2008 23:40 UTC
bproven2
Member since:
2008-04-30

While others looking for an enterprise ready product will use vmware. ;)

v Find your lover and enjoy together.
by vanilla1988 on Thu 3rd Jul 2008 07:13 UTC
Jesus H. Christ
by Weeman on Fri 4th Jul 2008 13:19 UTC
Weeman
Member since:
2006-03-20

That MS guy in the interview says they only support SLES. One single distro.

As far as I remember, all Linux distros use more or less the same kernel. Why would Microsoft have to enter talks, with e.g. Red Hat as claimed in the article, to "get it supported"?

That's what's wrong with them. They don't even try.