Linked by Tony Steidler-Dennison on Thu 10th Jul 2008 08:35 UTC, submitted by Zephyrcat
Fedora Core Though features are not yet being officially accepted for Fedora 10, there are already plenty of great proposed features. We can only hope they make it into the final release!
Order by: Score:

Web Based Software Portal?
by sukru on Thu 10th Jul 2008 08:44 UTC
sukru
Member since:
2006-11-19

I think I'm a little bit old minded, but...

What's the benefit of a web based software portal? We already have a stable yum system, with very good desktop frontends. Additionally we have sites like gnomefiles to discover, and discuss about newer software.

Why build another site, while we already have the features easily accessible today?

RE: Web Based Software Portal?
by Moredhas on Thu 10th Jul 2008 09:18 UTC in reply to "Web Based Software Portal?"
Moredhas Member since:
2008-04-10

Sometimes it's hard to see the benefit of a feature when it's just down in text. I use Mint, and I didn't get the software portal at first, but I find it quite useful. The Mint software portal allows for users to post reviews and rate the software, which can be helpful to people who aren't sure what program they want (i.e, when they're new to Linux and open source software).

Granted, there isn't much benefit for people who know the software they want, but it's a nice feature for new users.

RE[2]: Web Based Software Portal?
by Adurbe on Thu 10th Jul 2008 11:28 UTC in reply to "RE: Web Based Software Portal?"
Adurbe Member since:
2005-07-06

I also use mint but the portal is lacking applications such as vmware, parallels, crossover, commercial trials which would be useful to many people.

There needs to be a more commercial side to the software on offer (mainly demos/trials)

The only apps I have used the mint portal to install are skype and google earth, everything else seems to be a no-name gamble to achive what I want

otherwise apt works just as well

RE: Web Based Software Portal?
by Rahul on Thu 10th Jul 2008 09:39 UTC in reply to "Web Based Software Portal?"
Rahul Member since:
2005-07-06
RE: Web Based Software Portal?
by Kroc on Thu 10th Jul 2008 13:21 UTC in reply to "Web Based Software Portal?"
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

Think iTunes AppStore, but where everything is free! ;)

v JSenior Match
by kikiloveu on Thu 10th Jul 2008 08:50 UTC
Live CD Without the CD?
by elliott1787 on Thu 10th Jul 2008 08:52 UTC
elliott1787
Member since:
2008-07-03

Live CD Without the CD - Instead of creating a program like Wubi to let you do a special partitioning-free installation from Windows, the plan here is to make a Windows program that essentially lets you run the live CD straight from the ISO image on your hard drive.

Like we can already do with VitrualBox or any of the other virtualization software?

RE: Live CD Without the CD?
by Rahul on Thu 10th Jul 2008 09:41 UTC in reply to "Live CD Without the CD?"
Rahul Member since:
2005-07-06

The feature proposal for installation from Windows seems to be based on

http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/InstallFromWindows has more details.

RE: Live CD Without the CD?
by ebasconp on Thu 10th Jul 2008 13:33 UTC in reply to "Live CD Without the CD?"
ebasconp Member since:
2006-05-09

Several options to do this:

* Provide a VMware (or QEMU or Bochs or VirtualBox) image and start the "LiveCD" inside it.

* Compile all the Fedora environment on top of Cygwin and run the stuff inside there (this is quite ridiculous because it is not feasible).

* Use coLinux kernel instead of the Fedora one [Ubuntu has a version using this approach].

RE[2]: Live CD Without the CD?
by gilboa on Thu 10th Jul 2008 16:42 UTC in reply to "RE: Live CD Without the CD?"
gilboa Member since:
2005-07-06

... Or have grub/ntloader loop-mount a ext3/iso-image from from your FAT32/NTFS drive and boot from it.

- Gilboa

Xubuntu
by simo on Fri 11th Jul 2008 07:19 UTC
simo
Member since:
2006-01-09

Funnily enough I had the mis-fortune to have to get an IPv6 webserver working on a 256Mb P3 the other day, so thought I'd try Xubuntu - what a load of rubbish, it actually had a higher CPU load than regular Ubuntu and was completely unusable.

I ended up putting CentOS 5.1 on there which ran like a dream even in runlevel 5!

How about working wireless for F10, its totally broken for anything but Atheros in F9.

RE: Xubuntu
by Rahul on Fri 11th Jul 2008 13:26 UTC in reply to "Xubuntu"
Rahul Member since:
2005-07-06

It works very well with Intel wireless too. Unfortunately there was intermediate breakage with a security fix which has subsequently been fixed. Red Hat employs the upstream wireless subsystem maintainer so Fedora pretty much carries the latest wireless bits at all times. Without getting into proprietary drivers, wireless in Fedora is certainly among the best in Linux.