Post a Comment
Right, because the more relevant definition here would obviously be "a usually wooden pier used as a landing place or moorage for boats" or "the part of an animal's tail left after it has been shortened".
Ahahahaha, when has that ever stopped them before?
NeXT had a dock. OS/2 had a dock. The Win 95 task bar was (debatably) an ugly version of a dock (ignoring the launching aspect). Nobody is saying that implementing a dock is novel.
There are flat docks, disjointed docks, tile docks, any number of ways to make it look, yet Samsung ends up copying Apple again with a shelf under the icons, including icon reflections on it. Seriously?
Whether it's legal for Samsung to do it, and whether the legal system is screwed up is another issue,... But. It. Is. Just. A. Copy. Again.
Apparently that's what Samsung does. Hopefully you never come up with any product idea that Samsung takes interest in. 
Project Looking Glass, an ugly java based desktop by Sun Microsystems, had a dock that looked just like that. It was demoed for the first time in 2003 ie. 4 years before Apple created a similar dock. Contrary to what some people (and apple) think, not every UI feature implemented by Apple is invented by them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Looking_Glass
Interestingly, Apple claimed that PLG infringed on their IP and threatened to sue Sun.
And here I thought I was replying to a post that claimed that Samsung copied the visual style of the OSX dock when in fact another desktop environment used the same visual style way before Apple.
But hey, don't let your lack of actually having read the thread get in the way when you want to reply right?
My point was that the concept of a dock goes much further back than Samsung/Apple. Apple inherited the dock concept and code when they absorbed NeXT, and as Mellin pointed out, it existed before NeXT too.
To put it another way, electric guitars have had magnetic coil pickups since the 1930s, but you don't see Yamaha suing Fender because they both use them. That's because the concept has been around longer than either company has been making them.
And the reason I replied to you in that tone was because you are incorrect in the first place; Apple had a dock in the very first version of OS X, which was a few years before Project Glass.
Edited 2012-08-29 19:14 UTC
Well, it's hard to tell who owns what these days.
For company image I don't think it's wise after getting countless accusations of copying Apple and loosing a court case about it to come up with a Windows launcher that looks like the OS X dock.
They're are creating an image that they copy Apple which will cause people to point to Apple on any new Samsung product even when the resemblance is so remote that it should requires a lot if imagination.
http://t.co/8vwbEycd
Anyone can use it as far as I am concerned. It may not be very original, but people are used to it.
But if you are called Samsung it may be wiser to be a little more creative or base the look on another dock/launcher and not the OS X one.
People with half a brain cell will start making links with Apple product even when there are no (intentional) ones and Samsung's brand name will start to feel like a cheap Asian copy of premium western products.
That is ludicrous. You do realize that Samsung had this in development prior to the verdict? Why would they not continue through on that development choice? Apple did not create the 'dock'.
It may not seem like it but there is a growing backlash coming for Apple in this Pyrrhic victory. I am seeing article after editorial after commentary discussing how this is going to cost both businesses & consumers, stifle global trade, close international markets to Apple, and at least in the short term hamper innovation.
I have used Apple products (and Microsoft & Unix/Linux too) for over 30 years. I won't buy another. I don't even own a current 'smartphone' but if I must get one in the near future it definitely won't be an iPhone. I am not alone.
And I am not just an IT 'fanboy' picking a favorite team. I am a professional in different fields who can and does influence choices of the platforms that we do our work on. Apple's corporate hubris is not good for the market. To trusts such an entity as it is becoming is just asking for trouble in the long-term even if the short-term popularity and 'gee-whiz' seems so tempting and appealing. There are very good reasons why NASA recently chose an Android based Samsung phone for a satellite project and not an iPhone. The hardware & the software are both open.
So, Samsung is adding their own dock with a start button analog, but putting the button somewhat in the middle more or less, depending on how many other things are in the dock, rather than putting it in a fixed location you can access by muscle memory. It's not even in the corner. I don't mind Samsung copying Apple, but why do they tend to copy Apple's mistakes?
it's not clear from the screenshots but it looks like the dock is not on top of other windows, so if you want to access it you have to show the desktop first, kinda pointless imho if it's not something that you can access fast enough since that's the main problem with using metro instead of the the windows 7 start menu for launching programs or search for files
We had HotLauncher for BeOS.
http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA013465/HotLauncher/HotLauncher_e.h...
I try windows 8 every few days and no matter what, it still stinks!
The option to put it back to windows 7 is the only good choice.
Windows 8 doesn't seem to be any faster or better or offer any other feature I might wish. It is almost impossible to turn off. Too complicated to use anything. Idiots at MS must be trying to lose money.
Ballmer has gone mad over the iPhone and has doubled down on an idiot named Sinofsky. I have no doubt that the majority of MS employees would be against Windows 8 in its current state.
But I'm sure a Windows 8 defender will at any moment tell us that we're afraid of change.
That leads to another question: Why are wheels round? We need change and progress. If you are against modern octagon shaped wheel design then you are afraid of change and stuck in the past. Octagon wheels are new and new is evolution. Efficiency is just an excuse used by change haters. I can't wait to drive on modernist octagon wheels and use an ad screen with a horizontal scroll bar to find my applications. I am an awesome tech embracing dude and I don't fear change. My ego depends on embracing this type of idiocy without question.
Edited 2012-08-28 20:41 UTC
Are you and Nelson going to hang around Best Buy to help people navigate the invisible buttons?
I can see it now:
NO WAIT DONT LEAVE, WINDOWS 8 IS NOT A POS LIKE EVERYONE SAYS. JUST GIMME ANOTHER 10 MINUTES.
Good software doesn't need forum defenders. When Firefox 1.0 came out I didn't see continual explanations of why it doesn't actually suck. It took off with a wide variety of users because it was a clear improvement over IE6. I had non-technical people asking me if I had used it. My annoying clueless neighbor even came over to tell me about how great it was.
Wake the f*** up already. Windows 8 is shitty software. The fact that Samsung is doing this speaks volumes.
This free open source app does one better. It not only puts the start button back in Windows 8 but has the ability to let users choose which style start menu they prefer. Best of all, this app has the ability to bypass Windows 8's stupid formerly-known-as-Metro thingy altogether. Now that's what I'm talking about!!
http://classicshell.sourceforge.net/index.html
http://www.webpronews.com/windows-8-gets-the-start-button-back-with...
Edited 2012-08-28 21:08 UTC
I just tried this application on Windows 8 and it really is fantastic, thanks for the tip!
Actually, it's really good for Windows 7 too. Maybe I am morphing into a luddite, but the classic Start Menu really is much nicer (and intuitive) for me to use.
*shrugs*
Tip: Now add "7+ Taskbar Tweaker" to really make it feel like home.
http://rammichael.com/7-taskbar-tweaker





