Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 13:21 UTC, submitted by cprpop
Window Managers A new release of Blackbox in the latest 0.70 series is now out: 0.70.1 cumulates new features and bugfixes added to CVS over the last 8 months. Read on for a list of the most notable changes.
Order by: Score:
v Hilarious
by Anonymous on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 13:55 UTC
cool
by Anonymous on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 14:14 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

awsome, my favorite WM is still growing. for a while i thought we had lost u.

Reply Score: 0

v RE: cool
by Anonymous on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 16:37 UTC in reply to "cool"
nice
by Who is That on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 14:37 UTC
Who is That
Member since:
2005-07-02

In 5 years they have advanced to a patch level.

Reply Score: 1

Cool
by jaboua on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 14:47 UTC
jaboua
Member since:
2005-09-08

This is cool, I for the last year thought blackbox was dead - I thought fluxbox was a continuation, not a fork

Reply Score: 1

v RE: Cool
by Anonymous on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 15:26 UTC in reply to "Cool"
v This is hilarious
by Anonymous on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 15:01 UTC
RE: This is hilarious
by jaboua on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 15:09 UTC in reply to "This is hilarious"
jaboua Member since:
2005-09-08

Why is this double posted?

Reply Score: 1

v RE[2]: This is hilarious
by Anonymous on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 15:12 UTC in reply to "RE: This is hilarious"
RE[3]: This is hilarious
by DigitalAxis on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 15:14 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: This is hilarious"
DigitalAxis Member since:
2005-08-28

Yes, because it's dead (never mind they just released something) nobody's allowed to like it any more.

Right.

Reply Score: 1

v RE[4]: This is hilarious
by Anonymous on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 15:16 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: This is hilarious"
v RE[5]: This is hilarious
by Ethyriel on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 15:21 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: This is hilarious"
v RE[6]: This is hilarious
by Anonymous on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 15:36 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: This is hilarious"
RE[7]: This is hilarious
by Anonymous on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 16:23 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: This is hilarious"
Anonymous Member since:
---

I actually thought this was a good joke, why moderate it down?

Reply Score: 0

window edge snapping
by Ethyriel on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 15:02 UTC
Ethyriel
Member since:
2005-07-07

It's good to see this feature, it's something I just can't live without in floating window managers. Besides that (and window memory ala Devil's Pie or E16's Remember) Blackbox seemed to get it just about right with 0.7

I wish someone would adopt bbtools

Reply Score: 1

re:cool
by Anonymous on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 16:58 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

what do u hav against blackbox? personally its the only out of the box wm i can install and keep my sanity. everything else is bloated, a pain in the but to configure to anything usable, or ugly at best.

blackbox is my favorite, fluxbox and evolution being good. then i spose xfce, and sumwhere just above completly unusable i would stick gnome, kde being completly unusable without more work then is tolerable.

Reply Score: 0

RE: re:cool
by jonas on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 17:47 UTC in reply to "re:cool"
jonas Member since:
2005-07-08

blackbox is my favorite, fluxbox and evolution being good. then i spose xfce, and sumwhere just above completly unusable i would stick gnome, kde being completly unusable without more work then is tolerable.

you aren't differentiating between wm's and de's... kde's wm has a few more features than metacity; at least, that are enabled by default or that are easily configurable.

my favorite window manager is xfwm4: attractive themes, excellent defaults, and it has all of the quirky features that I use often (mouse wheel for window shading, alt left & right clicks). As it turns out, its not particularly well written (or at least, tests have shown it to be pretty slow), but as long as it *feels* quick (which it does), i really don't mind it taking a few extra cycles.

right now (and for the past few months) i am using xfwm4 with kde and i am happy with the ballance of features, configurability, and performance.

Reply Score: 1

v Who still cares?
by setuid_w00t on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 18:16 UTC
RE: Who still cares?
by nny_ on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 18:39 UTC in reply to "Who still cares?"
nny_ Member since:
2005-07-16

it's not about superiority, the _point_ is to have a lightweight window manager.

blackbox is perfect for me... i dont need any further features added to it... (just patches)

Edited 2005-11-03 18:43

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: Who still cares?
by Anonymous on Fri 4th Nov 2005 08:45 UTC in reply to "RE: Who still cares?"
Anonymous Member since:
---

Exactly how I feel...

Anyhow, BB now implements piped menu, a feature I was eagerly waiting for.
At some stage I was so desperate that I even started to hack it in myself ...

Reply Score: 0

Blackbox is what some people want
by Anonymous on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 18:26 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

I use Blackbox as my only WM, and I've tried ALL of them. from Gnome and KDE all the way down to Ratpoison. Blackbox gives me only what I want and nothing more. I think it's perfect.

Blackbox hasn't "advanced" because it has all the features the author wanted!

Reply Score: 1

Anonymous Member since:
---

Gnome and KDE are not window managers. They include window managers along with the other applictions which make up their respective desktop environments. Metacity and KWM. So long as Blackbox implements the same standards (probably safe to assume it does) used by Metacity and KWM then you can use it in a Gnome/KDE desktop instead of their default window managers.

Reply Score: 1

Changelog
by DigitalAxis on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 20:07 UTC
DigitalAxis
Member since:
2005-08-28

I couldn't view their changelog; the page timed out. Does anyone know what changed?

Reply Score: 1

Any wm + screen
by nguyenthanhvuh on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 20:13 UTC
nguyenthanhvuh
Member since:
2005-07-06

I used to use BB for several years but now currently use IceWM. However I can use any WM fine if screen is availabe. It's surprising to see so many debates over WM's and DE's and yet not too many credits to the incredibly useful screen.

Reply Score: 1

Tear-Off Menus?
by Anonymous on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 21:40 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

Anyone know if tear-off menus have been readded? It was in the TODO file for 0.70.0 so I'm hoping it made it in this release though I don't see it in the changelog

Reply Score: 0

Blackbox, Fluxbox, Openbox
by Anonymous on Fri 4th Nov 2005 08:55 UTC
Anonymous
Member since:
---

I find it hard to decide between Blackbox and Fluxbox. At the moment I lean towards Blackbox (with bbkeys) because it seems more stable than Fluxbox, but this might change once Fluxbox reaches 1.0 release. I like the built-in feature set in Fluxbox but the stability varies a lot between different Fluxbox releases while Blackbox has always been very reliable. Anyway, it's Blackbox or Fluxbox for me -- so far I haven't much liked Openbox. But if Openbox becomes easier to configure (possibly with a gui config tool), then it will be a tough decision between the three *boxes.

Reply Score: 0

RE: Blackbox, Fluxbox, Openbox
by Ethyriel on Fri 4th Nov 2005 14:15 UTC in reply to "Blackbox, Fluxbox, Openbox"
Ethyriel Member since:
2005-07-07

It's not technically a *box, but you might want to look into PekWM as it's quite similar. It's still quite early in development, though.

Reply Score: 1