Post a Comment
Whenever I hear about these sub-micro OSs, like Contiki and MP3 and Prex and Wheels, I ponder porting them to a more modern (read: x86) architecture.
Then again, in giving them support for all the things a typical modern computer user takes for granted, I'd just wind up with a very quirky OS about the size of a typical OS, I think.
By 'modern architecture' you appear to mean 'desktop architecture'.
Modern is defined by a timeline, i.e something that is created around the same time as you are making that statement would be defined as modern.
There are many modern processors for embedded systems, PPC, MIPS, ARM etc.
"Many embedded platforms are just as modern a x86 (if x86 can even be called a modern architecture)."
Many thinks we're using today do we consider to be modern, allthough they're some years old. The x86 architecture - in its basics - is circa 25 years old, the base of the Internet, i. e. TCP/IP, and other networking stuff is even older. But all these old basics can be found in the results of modern development, usually in its original representations. It's just because Intel et al. have tweaked a steam powered locomotive to run at 500 mph which we consider to be fast. :-)




