Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 22nd Jul 2009 09:26 UTC
Multimedia, AV Geeks.com, home to many Kodak digital cameras, sent us in the Kodak V1073 10MP digicam, one of the first touchscreen digicams in the market. Naturally, we had to put its user interface under some scrutiny, and compare it to the UI of the non-touchscreen Kodak cameras.
Order by: Score:
broken images
by aesiamun on Wed 22nd Jul 2009 15:45 UTC
aesiamun
Member since:
2005-06-29

All the images seem to be broken links.

Edited 2009-07-22 15:46 UTC

Reply Score: 1

Touch Screen Obsession
by davyc on Wed 22nd Jul 2009 19:23 UTC
davyc
Member since:
2006-07-20

Am I the only person left in the world who hates touchscreens? I hated it on my mobile phone and I sure don't want one on a camera. It's bad enough that they don't put viewfinders on these little camera's any more. Now, as well as not being able to see the screen in sunlight to compose the shot, you won't be able to work the controls either. Thank god I have an SLR where buttons and viewfinders are mandatory. How long before we get laptops without proper keyboards but with a cruddy touchscreen instead? Touchscreens are a stupid fad that I hope dies out soon. Die, die, die!

Reply Score: 1

RE: Touch Screen Obsession
by raynevandunem on Thu 23rd Jul 2009 19:57 UTC in reply to "Touch Screen Obsession"
raynevandunem Member since:
2006-11-24

Maybe they're in fashion because of the moving, uncryptic UI instead of the fixed buttons which can't be changed except in their functions?

Granted, in the future, I hope to see better, more dynamic haptics to be infused with touchscreens so that we can instantaneously "feel" and "press" the dimensions of whatever we're seeing on the screen (ideally, a plus for the visually impaired if dynamically-rendered Braille raised dots are incorporated); haptic touchscreens, IMO, are only the bare basics of a fluid, click/press-heavy 2D UI.

Reply Score: 2

Crappy Images
by drgfuk on Wed 22nd Jul 2009 19:37 UTC
drgfuk
Member since:
2009-07-22

Its funny that the main feature of this camera is a touch screen. When the images from this sensor look so bad (chewed up and noisy) who cares about the user interface.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Crappy Images
by Eugenia on Wed 22nd Jul 2009 19:52 UTC in reply to "Crappy Images"
Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28

I wouldn't say they are crappy. Sure they are crappy compared to a DSLR, but for a $100 camera, it performs much better than others. Everything is relative in this world.

Besides, Kodak's main market is actually printing pictures, and these pics do look good printed. Family people need no more than that.

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: Crappy Images
by jeanmarc on Thu 23rd Jul 2009 06:04 UTC in reply to "RE: Crappy Images"
jeanmarc Member since:
2005-07-06

I really hope Kodak's main market is not about printing any more.
I've actually print about 100 pictures per year (and they are even not for me), and I shoot more than 5000 pictures a year...

Reply Score: 2

Is it really the first touch screen camera ?
by Lamnk on Thu 23rd Jul 2009 10:49 UTC
Lamnk
Member since:
2008-06-25

Perhaps i am mistaken, but i have seen a friend using a Sony p&s digital camera that has touch screen a long time ago

Reply Score: 2

Eugenia Member since:
2005-06-28

Who said "the first"? The article clearly states "one of the first".

Reply Score: 1

Small fingers....
by truckweb on Fri 24th Jul 2009 12:18 UTC
truckweb
Member since:
2005-07-06

Looking at the video, seems like you need to have small fingers to be able to use the touch correctly.

I would find it frustrating after a while. It's not for me.

Reply Score: 2