Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Sep 2009 22:29 UTC
Mac OS X "Apple is moving quickly to patch holes and repair incompatibilities within Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, having already providing some developers with betas of the first maintenance and security update planned for the new operating system. Three people familiar with the matter say the Mac maker issued the first external builds of Mac OS X 10.6.1 to a select group of developers on Monday, September 1st. The move comes just four days after Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard hit retail shelves."
Order by: Score:
Well...
by mrhasbean on Fri 4th Sep 2009 02:59 UTC
mrhasbean
Member since:
2006-04-03

...people did want faster patches... ;)

Reply Score: 2

RE: Well...
by kaiwai on Fri 4th Sep 2009 03:36 UTC in reply to "Well..."
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

...people did want faster patches... ;)


Release early, release often. Mind you, considering that programming stopped on Snow Leopard back at around August 13 (when 10A432 was finalised), by the time it is released, it would have been a month since made GM. I wouldn't be surprised if we ended up seeing updates for Windows 7 after it has been officially launched October 22.

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: Well...
by poundsmack on Fri 4th Sep 2009 16:18 UTC in reply to "RE: Well..."
poundsmack Member since:
2005-07-13

"I wouldn't be surprised if we ended up seeing updates for Windows 7 after it has been officially launched October 22."

It has been, I have gotten a few already.

Reply Score: 2

10.x.1 in 3-4 weeks usually
by bousozoku on Fri 4th Sep 2009 04:11 UTC
bousozoku
Member since:
2006-01-23

It's not unusual for them to finish 10.x.1 about 3 to 4 weeks after the initial release is available.

I find it months later that things start to work correctly, though when they're up to 10.x.4 or so.

Reply Score: 3

What about OpenGL 3.2
by moondevil on Fri 4th Sep 2009 06:37 UTC
moondevil
Member since:
2005-07-08

I had hoped that Snow Leopard would bring updated OpenGL drivers, but no, they are still at 2.1 version level!


Waiting to see what will come with this update, but if it is not updated, I might as well stay in Windows/Linux world.

Reply Score: 1

OS 10.6 Graphics Drivers
by asupcb on Fri 4th Sep 2009 11:17 UTC
asupcb
Member since:
2005-11-10

Do you guys think that the graphics drivers were rewritten specifically for 10.6 and to take advantage of OpenCL? If I'm not mistaken Apple helps nVidia and AMD/ATI write graphics drivers for the Mac platform. Does the emphasis on OpenCL explain why they may have decided to stick with OpenGL 2.x for 10.6 and instead focus first on getting OpenCL working correctly? Would this explain some of the performance regressions in OpenGL performance that Phronix found?

Will we have to wait until 10.7 for OpenGL 3.x support? How long will it be until 10.7 is released and what features do you think it may feature?

Reply Score: 2

RE: OS 10.6 Graphics Drivers
by tyrione on Sat 5th Sep 2009 00:49 UTC in reply to "OS 10.6 Graphics Drivers"
tyrione Member since:
2005-11-21

Do you guys think that the graphics drivers were rewritten specifically for 10.6 and to take advantage of OpenCL? If I'm not mistaken Apple helps nVidia and AMD/ATI write graphics drivers for the Mac platform. Does the emphasis on OpenCL explain why they may have decided to stick with OpenGL 2.x for 10.6 and instead focus first on getting OpenCL working correctly? Would this explain some of the performance regressions in OpenGL performance that Phronix found?

Will we have to wait until 10.7 for OpenGL 3.x support? How long will it be until 10.7 is released and what features do you think it may feature?


Probably not before Nvidia or ATi actually release OpenGL 3.2 final drivers on non-OS X systems.

On another note, not until LLVM 2.6 is released do I see them addressing the final drivers for OS X that will improve OpenCL and OpenGL coverage.

Reply Score: 2

Comment by mieses
by mieses on Fri 4th Sep 2009 18:05 UTC
mieses
Member since:
2006-02-07

Did they fix the problem of unibody 13" Macbooks not being allowed to run 64 bit kernels?

Reply Score: 2

RE: Comment by mieses
by apoclypse on Fri 4th Sep 2009 18:41 UTC in reply to "Comment by mieses"
apoclypse Member since:
2007-02-17

Does it matter? Howd does this affect you negatively other than bragging rights? Can't run your 64-bit applications anyway?

Reply Score: 1

RE[2]: Comment by mieses
by polaris20 on Fri 4th Sep 2009 21:34 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by mieses"
polaris20 Member since:
2005-07-06

Does it matter? Howd does this affect you negatively other than bragging rights? Can't run your 64-bit applications anyway?


Can't you just either answer the question or not answer the question, instead of responding in such a rude manner?

Reply Score: 3

RE: Comment by mieses
by DaveDavtropen on Sat 5th Sep 2009 00:45 UTC in reply to "Comment by mieses"
DaveDavtropen Member since:
2009-03-20

Doubtful. If I remember correctly, that was a firmware issue.

Reply Score: 1