Linked by diegocg on Mon 21st May 2012 19:10 UTC
Linux Linux kernel 3.4 has been released. New features include several Btrfs updates: support of metadata blocks bigger than 4KB, much improved metadata performance, better error handling and better recovery tools; there is also a new X32 ABI which allows to run programs in 64 bit mode with 32 bit pointers; several updates to the GPU drivers: early modesetting of Nvidia Geforce 600 'Kepler', support of AMD RadeonHD 7xxx and AMD Trinity APU series, and support of Intel Medfield graphics; support of x86 cpu driver autoprobing, two new device-mapper targets, several perf improvements such as GTK2 report GUI and a new 'Yama' security module. Here's the full list of changes.
Order by: Score:
by 1c3d0g on Tue 22nd May 2012 00:32 UTC
Member since:

Great! As a die-hard M$ fan, the way Windows 8 is going, I'm eager to finally install a Linux distro on my desktop permanently. I'm sure many others are pondering about this as well. Metro is so f*cked up to use (such a productivity killer - yes, I tried the latest beta, it's still crap), I'm willing to bet everything I own that no serious business (let's say the Forbes 500) will ever allow Windows 8 on their desktops as a default. Maybe for special purposes only, but nothing more.

On another note: does anybody know if BTRFS is stable enough for regular use? Last I heard there were still some people losing files or waking up with a borked file system. I was recommended ext4 (which I like), but I'm always looking for a "better" file system.

Reply Score: 6

RE: Awesome
by tidux on Tue 22nd May 2012 00:37 UTC in reply to "Awesome"
tidux Member since:

BtrFS doesn't have a production quality fsck yet, so it'd be playing russian roulette with your data. Hopefully that'll be there by 3.5.

Reply Score: 3

RE: Awesome
by jessesmith on Tue 22nd May 2012 00:38 UTC in reply to "Awesome"
jessesmith Member since:

Btrfs is probably stable enough to use, but its recovery tools (the last time I checked) were not up to par with the recovery tools for other file systems. Plus Btrfs in my tests is quite a bit slower than ext4. You're probably better off using ext3 or ext4 for now, until Btrfs performance and reliability have been proven.

Reply Score: 4

RE[2]: Awesome
by HangLoose on Tue 22nd May 2012 09:36 UTC in reply to "RE: Awesome"
HangLoose Member since:

I used btrfs on my Ubuntu 11.04 system (just as a trial) and it totally bogged down I/O operations on my system.

Only figured it out that it was actually the case when doing a fresh install for the 12.04

So you can try it if you want (and you probably should since there might be some hardware issues related to that) but just remember that in case something funky happens to revert to ext3 or 4 and check if you have same issues.

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: Awesome
by Sodki on Tue 22nd May 2012 10:09 UTC in reply to "RE: Awesome"
Sodki Member since:

Btrfs is probably stable enough to use

Unfortunately, no. I've played with it on disposal data and results were a bit frightening... It will get there, but right now it's not stable for production use.

Reply Score: 3

RE: Awesome
by hussam on Tue 22nd May 2012 01:25 UTC in reply to "Awesome"
hussam Member since:

Stick to ext4. It's just as supported as any newly added file system.

Edit: and probably just as good.

Edited 2012-05-22 01:34 UTC

Reply Score: 5

RE: Awesome
by Lennie on Tue 22nd May 2012 02:31 UTC in reply to "Awesome"
Lennie Member since:

Btrfs is looking better every release, but it isn't for everyone yet.

Windows 8 will be the next Vista.

I wouldn't be surprised if more business uses the newer Windows server version than the desktop version.

As the server version got a lot of new tricks.

I've been off Windows for years now, so I don't care what Windows does. Personally I'm looking forward to seeing bcache* get merged in the Linux kernel.

This also seems to be more and more likely to happen soon (by some definitions of soon).


Reply Score: 4

RE: Awesome
by turrini on Tue 22nd May 2012 11:10 UTC in reply to "Awesome"
turrini Member since:

Or use XFS ;)

I've been using XFS for years without a glitch. Fast, scalable, simply fantastic.

Reply Score: 3

RE[2]: Awesome
by MattPie on Tue 22nd May 2012 15:55 UTC in reply to "RE: Awesome"
MattPie Member since:

I've been using XFS for years without a glitch. Fast, scalable, simply fantastic.

I did some testing with XFS a few months ago. An IO-bound process took over 5 days (!!) on ext3, 14 hours on XFS). In my testing, ext4 was a little faster than XFS, but it still takes *way* to long to fsck.ext4 a 1TB file system filled with tiny files. Fsck.xfs is always under 2 seconds.

Reply Score: 2

RE[3]: Awesome
by Lennie on Tue 22nd May 2012 23:36 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Awesome"
Lennie Member since:

You might like this XFS presentation from Jan. this year:

Reply Score: 2

RE: Awesome
by Nth_Man on Tue 22nd May 2012 13:11 UTC in reply to "Awesome"
Nth_Man Member since:

I'm eager to finally install a Linux distro on my desktop permanently

First I would try it some times. There's a "VirtualBox disk image of Kubuntu 11.04 i386 Desktop, stable version" on
to conduct experiments on it.

About it there is a README.txt on

If you have any doubt, on this thread you can make questions.

Reply Score: 2