Post a Comment
Amazing that simply having the same name and logo as a long defunct (but fondly remembered) computer manufacturer can get them so much free publicity.
Maybe if those laptops included RISC OS (using Virtual RISC PC) then I could see why people on OSNews.com would be interested in their release. As it is I just wish people would ignore the "new Acorn", I don't think they deserve to get extra column inches because of this cynical marketing gimmick.
If they're actually a success on the back of warm nostalgic feelings towards the Acorn brand, which classic computer brand names are going to be abused next? I don't have any desire to see the Sinclair name on a generic modern PC...
there logo is upside down.. look at : http://www.acorncomputer.co.uk/images/lifestyle1a.jpg
when you raise the cover the acorn is just like the old apple logo "up side down" :-)
Sorry I'm not an apple zealot, but those Notebooks doesn't shine.
Nice Notebooks are Sony's Vaios and LG's XNote S1 (take a look at: http://de.red-dot.org/317.html)
Just because Acorn got a logo on the back it doesn't have to be shiny.
Regards
Patrick
Hah, i was wondering if i was the only one who thought it looked like that
I wonder if those images are work in progress versions or if that logo really went through their design department. I bet the majority of people will think it is an egg if they don't know it is supposed to be an acorn.
Assembled in Britain maybe, but most of the components will be made somewhere in Asia. This country like many others have abandoned the manufacturing industries and it will be our undoing.
If they made an affordable, lightweight, long battery life, ARM-based (e.g. Cortex) laptop with a decent keyboard and wifi chip supported by vanilla linux/freebsd, then they might have had some credibility with me. I know this is only fantasy though...





