Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Dec 2009 20:19 UTC
Mac OS X A clever little Mac utility : "Airlock allows your Mac to lock itself, plain and simple. Using your iPhone or iPod Touch, Bluetooth, and a smidgen of pixie dust, Airlock determines whether you're near your computer. When you leave the room - poof! - your Mac locks itself. "And when I come back?" You guessed it: your Mac unlocks. You can also customize Airlock to perform specific actions as you come and go - have your computer talk to you, log-in or out of iChat, walk the dog, and such."
Order by: Score:

For non iPhones...
by midoriconcept on Thu 10th Dec 2009 20:45 UTC
midoriconcept
Member since:
2006-12-01

Salling clicker does the same and much more for non iPhones, and works on windows and mac. Unfortunately is not free.. Also there was Romeo for mac, but has been discontinued...

Reply Score: 1

Mac ads
by vivainio on Thu 10th Dec 2009 20:55 UTC
vivainio
Member since:
2008-12-26

Osnews is an Apple advertising agency these days?

Reply Score: 1

RE: Mac ads
by David on Thu 10th Dec 2009 21:15 UTC in reply to "Mac ads"
David Member since:
1997-10-01

Next time we run across some software that seems really interesting, we'll make sure not to mention it, so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.

Reply Score: 3

RE[2]: Mac ads
by vivainio on Thu 10th Dec 2009 21:55 UTC in reply to "RE: Mac ads"
vivainio Member since:
2008-12-26

Next time we run across some software that seems really interesting, we'll make sure not to mention it, so as not to offend your delicate sensibilities.


This came right after "Apple Launches RSS Feed for iPhone Developer News" (now how's that for news?), and this one looked like a simple app advertisement for somewhat trivial technology.

I apologize for getting a bit trigger-happy. I've been enjoying osnews' slight anti-apple slant, and was concerned it would take turn for the worse ;-).

Reply Score: 3

RE[3]: Mac ads
by Chicken Blood on Thu 10th Dec 2009 23:03 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Mac ads"
Chicken Blood Member since:
2005-12-21


I apologize for getting a bit trigger-happy. I've been enjoying osnews' slight anti-apple slant, and was concerned it would take turn for the worse ;-).


Wow. you're a bit insecure aren't you?

Reply Score: 1

RE[4]: Mac ads
by Anonymous Coward on Fri 11th Dec 2009 01:51 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Mac ads"
Anonymous Coward Member since:
2005-07-06

Yes I am you insensitive Clod!

Reply Score: 1

RE[4]: Mac ads
by StephenBeDoper on Fri 11th Dec 2009 02:16 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Mac ads"
StephenBeDoper Member since:
2005-07-06

"
I apologize for getting a bit trigger-happy. I've been enjoying osnews' slight anti-apple slant, and was concerned it would take turn for the worse ;-).


Wow. you're a bit insecure aren't you?
"

No I'm not, why would you say that? You've been talking to Bob, haven't you?!?!?

Reply Score: 2

RE[4]: Mac ads
by vivainio on Fri 11th Dec 2009 06:58 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Mac ads"
vivainio Member since:
2008-12-26

Wow. you're a bit insecure aren't you?


I guess that's RDF Newspeak for "I don't share your preference, for the following reasons:" (apart from having the advantage of avoiding all the tedious typing)?

(A sign of the times btw: just noted that my spell checker did not recognize the word "netiquette").

Reply Score: 2

RE[5]: Mac ads
by Chicken Blood on Sun 13th Dec 2009 19:51 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Mac ads"
Chicken Blood Member since:
2005-12-21

"Wow. you're a bit insecure aren't you?


I guess that's RDF Newspeak for "I don't share your preference, for the following reasons:" (apart from having the advantage of avoiding all the tedious typing)?.
"

No. It's plainspeak, for "why would you be enjoying the negative news, but afraid of any positive news?"

That's not a preference, that's a deliberate rejection of objectivity for the sake of bias. The mentality of those who buy those sensationalist supermarket magazines.

Edited 2009-12-13 19:57 UTC

Reply Score: 2

RE[6]: Mac ads
by vivainio on Sun 13th Dec 2009 21:58 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Mac ads"
vivainio Member since:
2008-12-26

No. It's plainspeak, for "why would you be enjoying the negative news, but afraid of any positive news?"


You are reading way too much into a brief posting.

This just isn't interesting news - my mistake was to speak that out loudly, instead of doing the decent thing and ignoring it.

Reply Score: 2

RE[7]: Mac ads
by testman on Mon 14th Dec 2009 05:37 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Mac ads"
testman Member since:
2007-10-15

Osnews is an Apple advertising agency these days?

You are reading way too much into a brief posting.

The irony of your comment is not lost on me.

Reply Score: 2

RE: Mac ads
by Thom_Holwerda on Thu 10th Dec 2009 21:20 UTC in reply to "Mac ads"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

This has to be the first time in a long time that we've been accused of being pro-Apple.

You lost a bet there, David.

Reply Score: 3

RE[2]: Mac ads
by Laurence on Thu 10th Dec 2009 22:23 UTC in reply to "RE: Mac ads"
Laurence Member since:
2007-03-26

hehehe very true


Back on topic though:
I was thinking of building something just like this - seems like someone's saved me the trouble ;)

Reply Score: 2

RE: Mac ads
by mrhasbean on Thu 10th Dec 2009 21:31 UTC in reply to "Mac ads"
mrhasbean Member since:
2006-04-03

Osnews is an Apple advertising agency these days?


So it's OK in your opinion that they run article after article bagging Apple in every way possible, but as soon as there is something positive about a Mac App, not even something FROM Apple, they're an Apple advertising agency? And you people call the pro-Mac brigade zealots???

Reply Score: 2

RE[2]: Mac ads
by StephenBeDoper on Thu 10th Dec 2009 22:29 UTC in reply to "RE: Mac ads"
StephenBeDoper Member since:
2005-07-06

And you people call the pro-Mac brigade zealots???


Same coin, different sides.

One side complains if anyone displays "insufficient praise" - if they're not enthusiastic enough when it comes to praising Apple, then they're assumed to be anti-Apple zealots. The other side complains if anyone displays "insufficient condemnation" - if they're not critical enough of Apple, they're assumed to be pro-Apple zealots.

Speaking largely from the sidelines, neither approach is any more or less an example of zealotry than the other.

Reply Score: 3

Kind of a nice idea
by bralkein on Thu 10th Dec 2009 21:38 UTC
bralkein
Member since:
2006-12-20

It's a pretty good idea, but yeeugh, the website is so cutesy and patronising, managing to almost put me off the whole idea just for that. I mean yeah I know they want to sell this thing, but come on, I'd think it to be a parody if I didn't know better.

I'm getting a Nokia N900 soon (just as soon as my PAC code comes through) so it'll be interesting to see if I can whip up a script to do the same kind of thing for my laptop running Arch. I reckon it wouldn't take long. Of course it won't carry the same urban hipster cachet, but I think I can live with that ;)

Only problem I can think of is if you come to rely on it, then forget to take your phone with you when you leave then you will end up leaving your machine unlocked. But if you have it on a timer anyway I suppose that's not so bad.

Reply Score: 2

Bringbackanonposting
Member since:
2005-11-16

Surprised someone hasn't lashed out how this has been done before and somehow Apple again makes it seem new and cool...
Plugged my rubbish iPhone into a generic USB car charger yesterday. Unsurprisingly didn't work. The Apple factor strikes again.

Reply Score: 2

Morty Member since:
2005-07-06

Always cooler when it's Apple, obviously. It did not become very usefull with my usage pattern, but I thought it was a nifty hack when I tried it way back. Using bluez, KDE2 and my T61 :-)

Reply Score: 3

WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

Always cooler when it's Apple, obviously. It did not become very usefull with my usage pattern, but I thought it was a nifty hack when I tried it way back. Using bluez, KDE2 and my T61 :-)

I had a small script for locking my screen and starting and stopping a few services every time my phone went too far away from my computer, and unlocking the screen whenever I came back. It was quite handy except when my phone crashed and rebooted or when the battery suddenly went empty ;)

Reply Score: 3

Chicken Blood Member since:
2005-12-21

Surprised someone hasn't lashed out how this has been done before and somehow Apple again makes it seem new and cool...
Plugged my rubbish iPhone into a generic USB car charger yesterday. Unsurprisingly didn't work. The Apple factor strikes again.


Except this is made by a company called The M.H.A. and has nothing to do with Apple.

Reply Score: 3

Linux work-alike
by meuserj on Thu 10th Dec 2009 22:52 UTC
meuserj
Member since:
2005-08-22

BlueProximity

http://sourceforge.net/projects/blueproximity/

I've been using it for quite some time.. works great.

Reply Score: 1

Comment by mightshade
by mightshade on Thu 10th Dec 2009 22:53 UTC
mightshade
Member since:
2008-11-20

I remember doing the same thing about two years ago, using the tool "Proximity". That supported any Bluetooth device, not just iPods and iPhones.
I didn't find it to be particularly reliable, though. Sometimes my Mac would lock in front of me, despite my cellphone lying right next to the machine, or it would fail to unlock when approaching it. Perhaps Airlock handles these things better. Then again, I neither have an iThingy, nor OSX 10.5+. It's a shame, because it's a cool idea.

P.S. guide for doing that with Proximity here:
http://www.technocrat.ca/?p=44

Reply Score: 1

Dependence on gadgetry
by umccullough on Thu 10th Dec 2009 23:19 UTC
umccullough
Member since:
2006-01-26

I find it entertaining that people are constantly in search of new ways to increase their dependence on gadgets. Consumerism at its best I suppose.

Chalk it up to my minimalistic nature, but I tend to go the other direction - finding new ways to do without unnecessary "automation" in a search for simplicity and more control over my life (I even stopped carrying a cell phone ~5 years ago). Yeah, maybe I'm just a troll.

But having a device with me at all times which will lock/unlock my computer when I walk away or approach just seems like pure laziness. Reminds me of all those people who constantly forget logins/passwords because their browser or computer remembers for them automatically.

Reply Score: 3

KDE had this for years
by divansantana on Fri 11th Dec 2009 12:23 UTC
divansantana
Member since:
2005-12-15

Hi All,

I only found out now that this has been working in KDE for years.

Its so simple to set-up!

Right click KDE icon in system tray, go to kbluelock, select enable and click
on your phone. That's it.

NB: Pair KDE with your handset first so its discoverable.

Reply Score: 1